Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(3)
Furthermore, as he put it, "performance pay works great for mechanical tasks like soldering a circuit but works poorly for tasks that are deeply analytic or creative".
The process works well for photos with backgrounds such as sky or grass, in which there can be little variation in color and pattern, Avidan explains, although it works poorly for people's faces and more varied landscapes.
The corresponding antibody works poorly for Western blot, and monitoring KAP1 phosphorylation during viral reactivation in low numbers of HCMV-infected cells is beyond our current technical abilities.
Similar(57)
So in some ways, these if-then motivators work poorly for creative, conceptual tasks, in part because they work so well for the more routine, algorithmic tasks.
However, composition-based methods work poorly for ancient gene transfers12,13 and tend to give contrasting results when the methods are changed14.
However, conventional methods tend to work poorly for sugar-specific antibodies — in part because the glycan antigen can be tricky to make.
However, it says the retirement income system is working poorly for senior Australians on low-incomes who do not own their home and who have to rent in the private market.
Not only do the programs work poorly for many users, but they don't link Apple devices together as reliably as they should.
Not only do the programs work poorly for many users, but they don't link Apple devices together as reliably as they should.
In vivo interactions derived from two-hybrid or co-immunoprecipitation experiments tend to work poorly for S100B and most other EF-hand containing proteins due to the calcium-binding requirement.
The chemogenomic approach worked well for benchmark data consisting of many structurally similar compounds (e.g., those with chemical structure similarity thresholds of 1 or 0.9), but it worked poorly for structurally diverse compounds (e.g., those with similarity thresholds of 0.4 or 0.5).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com