won to

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "won to" is not correct and does not have a clear meaning in written English.
It seems to be a typographical error or a misphrasing. If you meant "won over," it can be used when referring to persuading someone or gaining their support. Example: "After much discussion, I finally won over my colleagues to my point of view."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Wiki

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

58 human-written examples

The official rate stands at 100 won to the dollar.

The Economist

But I don't know how I won, to be honest.

The Guardian - Sport

So they understood the significance Saturday when JoePa won to tie Bear while Bobby won to tie Pop.

The New York Times - Sports

Banks raised billions in foreign currency and passed them on as won to Korean firms.

The Economist

Her story, like Gentileschi's, features a legal case won to meagre satisfaction.

The New Yorker

He tied for second in the 2007 tournament that Anand won to become the world champion.

The New York Times

Samsung Electronics has handed maybe 800 billion won to its staff in a special bonus.

The Economist

Further, the Administration had been won to the support of the Thomas inflation programme.

The Economist

Recently, the couple sold a magic staff worth 500,000 won to pay for a vacation.

The New York Times

Miami won to improve to 4-3, groundg gronnd on the Jets in the division.

The New York Times - Sports

I'm proud of the campaign we won to unify our country, and to advocate conservative solutions..

The Guardian

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Avoid using the phrase "won to" in formal writing. Instead, consider more grammatically correct alternatives such as "won in order to" or "won and then". Review your sentence structure to ensure clarity and accuracy.

Common error

Be cautious of mistaking "won to" as a correct phrase. It's often a typo or misinterpretation. Double-check if you meant to use "won in order to" or a similar, more grammatically sound construction. Proofreading can help prevent this error.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "won to" appears to be used incorrectly in most contexts. Ludwig AI identifies it as a potential typographical error or misphrasing, as it doesn't conform to standard English grammar rules. Its intended function is often unclear without further context.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

50%

Wiki

25%

Science

25%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Academia

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "won to" is generally considered grammatically incorrect, as Ludwig AI points out. It's frequently found in various sources, likely due to typos or misinterpretations, but this doesn't validate its usage. To ensure clarity and correctness, consider using alternatives like "won in order to", or restructuring your sentence. Pay careful attention to proofreading, as the intended meaning is often obscured by this non-standard phrasing. Despite its common appearance, strive for grammatically sound alternatives to enhance the quality and credibility of your writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

managed to win

This alternative explicitly uses "managed", clarifying the effort involved in achieving the win.

succeeded in winning

This alternative emphasizes the successful completion of the effort required to win.

achieved victory in

This alternative employs more formal language, replacing "won" with "achieved victory", which is more emphatic.

was victorious in

This alternative uses the adjective "victorious", changing the grammatical structure of the sentence.

gained a win in

This alternative focuses on the act of gaining a victory, with a slightly different emphasis.

clinched a win in

This alternative uses "clinched", suggesting a secure or decisive victory.

emerged victorious in

This alternative emphasizes the outcome of a process, where someone comes out as the winner.

triumphed in

This alternative provides a more emphatic and formal expression of winning, implying overcoming significant challenges.

prevailed in

This alternative conveys the idea of overcoming opposition to win, highlighting resilience.

secured a win in

This alternative emphasizes the act of obtaining or securing a victory, often implying a deliberate effort.

FAQs

What are some alternatives to "won to"?

While "won to" is generally not grammatically correct, you can use alternatives such as "managed to win", "succeeded in winning", or rephrase the sentence for clarity.

How can I avoid using "won to" incorrectly?

Always proofread your writing and check for typos. If you find yourself using "won to", consider whether you meant "won in order to" or if a different verb construction would be more appropriate.

Is "won to" ever grammatically correct?

In most contexts, "won to" is not grammatically correct. It is usually a typo or a misinterpretation of another phrase. Context matters, but it's safer to use alternative phrasings.

What does it mean if I see "won to" in a sentence?

If you encounter "won to", it likely indicates a grammatical error. The writer may have intended to use a different phrase, such as "won in order to" or simply "won". Consider the surrounding context to discern the intended meaning.