Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(3)
Because the distribution of sUA is systemically different between men and women, quartile cutoffs were defined separately for each, based on baseline measurements.
For the aspirin group, quartile 1 was defined as 2.5 to 4.5 mg/dL for men, 1.4 to 5.25 mg/dL for women; quartile 2 was 4.53 to 5.37 mg/dL for men, 5.27 to 6.03 mg/dL for women; quartile 3 was 5.38 to 6.45 mg/dL for men, 6.05 to 7.0 mg/dL for women; and quartile 4 was 6.47 to 10.45 mg/dL for men, 7.02 to 12.52 mg/dL for women.
For the placebo group, quartile 1 was defined as 2.38 to 4.48 mg/dL for men, 1.83 to 5.28 mg/dL for women; quartile 2 was 4.5 to 5.42 mg/dL for men, 5.3 to 6.03 mg/dL for women; quartile 3 was 5.47 to 6.48 mg/dL for men, 6.05 to 6.97 mg/dL for women; and quartile 4 was 6.52 to11.05 mg/dL for men, 6.98 to 12.12 mg/dL for women.
Similar(56)
The cut-off values for quartiles on PCS and MCS were similar for men and women (PCS, quartile 1 = 49.0, quartile 2 = 53.4, quartile 3 = 55.3 and for MCS, quartile 1 = 47.8, quartile 2 = 53.2 and quartile 3 = 55.9).
We examined the association with 1 SD of SHBG concentration and categorized women by quartile of SHBG levels as defined among control subjects.
The multivariable geometric means of %DBV in women increasing quartiles of premenarcheal SHBG quartiles were 14.4 % to 18.7 %, 18.3 % and 24.3 % (Ptrend = 0.03).
In 2005, the median age was 25 years in women (inter-quartile range 21-30 years) and 31 years in men (inter-quartile range 27-35 years). 27-35 years
We then categorised women into quartiles of plasma β-carotene at baseline.
Table 2 summarizes the unadjusted and adjusted odds ratios (controlling for covariates which included age, BMI and cigarette smoking) for adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma in women across quartiles of FEV1.
When assessed as quartiles, women in the upper two quartiles of BMI had a greater risk of CBC compared to women in the lowest quartile (although the increase in risk for those in the highest quartile was within the limits of chance).
We also compared the predicted mortality with that observed for women in each quartile of predicted risk.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com