without your contribution

USAGE SUMMARY

The part of the sentence 'without your contribution' is correct and can be used in written English.
For example, you could say, "The project could not have been completed without your contribution."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

3 human-written examples

"Lucy, this wouldn't have happened without your contribution," Greens leader Richard Di Natale said as he addressed the Australian Parliament.

Vice

"Lucy, this wouldn't have happened without your contribution," Greens leader Richard Di Natale said as he addressed Parliament.

Vice

Sure, we all like the usual eggnog and spinach artichoke dips that make the scene, but the holidays are indulgent enough without your contribution.

Huffington Post

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

54 human-written examples

The blog wouldn't have been the success it has without your contributions.

The Guardian

Last month, while visiting Sweden, Mr. Gore told Dr. Bolin in a written statement: "Bert, you set up the framework for the I.P.C.C. and without your contributions we would not have come to where we are today.

The New York Times

Without your contributions, ecotoxicology would not be what it is today.

Environmental Sciences Europe

You are the ones who power the site, which would not exist without your contributions.

TechCrunch

It was always nice to blow peoples minds by introducing'em to you — and without your contributions to Google's voice recognition database, Android's voice search would be nowhere as wonderful.

TechCrunch

(You're especially welcome for the latter!) We can coexist without it diminishing your contribution, I promise.

Huffington Post

Except as set out here, we shall not make any other alteration to your Contribution without your permission.

The Guardian

In the e-mail, the executive, Bill Berl, recounted a fund-raising dinner with Mr. Visclosky the night before and told his business colleagues that "this opportunity to spend more than two hours with the congressman and his staff would not have been possible without your generous contributions".

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When acknowledging the importance of someone's role, follow "without your contribution" with a specific outcome to highlight the impact.

Common error

Avoid overstating the impact of one person's contribution to a group project. Acknowledge other contributors to ensure balanced recognition.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "without your contribution" functions primarily as a prepositional phrase that modifies a verb or clause, indicating a condition that prevents a certain outcome. It emphasizes the necessity of someone's input for a particular result, as seen in the Ludwig examples.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

News & Media

33%

Science

33%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Wiki

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "without your contribution" is a versatile expression used to acknowledge the crucial role someone played in an endeavor. Ludwig AI validates its correctness, marking it a phrase appropriate for emphasizing the indispensability of someone's involvement. While commonly found in news, media, and scientific contexts, it is important to consider the specific context to make the right choice of word. Alternatives such as "absent your input" or "were it not for your assistance" can adjust the tone to be more or less formal. Remember to highlight the specific impact of the contribution for maximum effect.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

absent your input

Replaces "contribution" with "input" and uses "absent" to convey the lack thereof.

lacking your assistance

Substitutes "contribution" with "assistance" and uses "lacking" to indicate the absence.

excluding your part

Replaces the noun with a description that describes the fact of not counting with a person's participation.

but for your involvement

Uses a counterfactual conditional structure to highlight the importance of the person's involvement.

were it not for your assistance

Employs a formal and hypothetical tone to emphasize the necessity of the person's help.

had you not participated

Uses the past perfect to describe hypothetical absence.

without your support

Replaces contribution with the word support.

in the absence of your help

Formal rephrasing with a similar meaning.

devoid of your effort

Emphasizes that the work isn't possible with your personal dedication.

exclusive of your aid

Replaces "contribution" with "aid" and uses "exclusive of" to express the absence.

FAQs

How can I rephrase "without your contribution" to sound more formal?

For a more formal tone, consider using phrases like "in the absence of your help" or "were it not for your assistance".

Is it correct to say "without your contributions" instead of "without your contribution"?

Yes, "without your contributions" is also correct. "Contribution" (singular) focuses on the overall impact, while "contributions" (plural) emphasizes individual acts or elements of input.

What's the difference between "without your contribution" and "because of your contribution"?

"Without your contribution" indicates something would not have been possible due to the absence of input. "Because of your contribution" means something was possible due to that input; they are opposites.

What are some alternatives to "contribution" in the phrase "without your contribution"?

You can replace "contribution" with words like "assistance", "input", "support", or "help", depending on the specific context.