Sentence examples for without good evidence from inspiring English sources

The advertisers who pay for the commercials have agreed to believe, without good evidence, that some meaningful percentage of viewers actually behave in this manner.

They have further agreed to believe, again without good evidence, that the sort of people who watch a particular program have a more than ordinary interest in the products advertised on that program.

Without an independent determination by agency experts on the optimal doses and precautions for a particular drug treatment, he said, doctors can wind up prescribing medications without good evidence.

The problem, Ms Johnson writes, is that those released have often been held for a year or more without good evidence, and the ceremony gives them a chance to talk about how much they resent that.

KAY JOHNSON reports that a ceremony to commemorate the release of four Afghans held without good evidence at America's Bagram detention centre may have created more resentment than it resolved".The Afghan people are hearing a lot of talk," said Walir Wakil, a community leader who wore a yellow turban and a suit jacket over his traditional robes.

Without good evidence on the chilling effects, we'll let readers decide whether self-censoring behavior extends to government employees.

And this is most often proposed without any good evidence at all.

In both cases, genotyping of additional sample series confirmed the originally reported associations, without demonstrating good evidence for the three simplest scenarios: independent functional variants; capture of the association signal by one of the pair of SNPs; or two-SNP tagging of a single haplotype on which functional variation lay.

But D. Sivanandhan, a joint commissioner in the Bombay Police Department who is leading the investigation, said he had taken on the politically connected tycoon because of "absolutely good evidence without which I wouldn't be risking my job".

"They are driven by profits over progress and by trying to move a drug as fast as they can into the clinic without getting all the good evidence they need," Dr. Karlawish said.

This kind of evaluation gives great emphasis on RCTs and metanalysis as an "a priori" source of good evidence without a systematic evaluation of study quality.