without benefits

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "without benefits" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe a situation, job, or arrangement that does not include additional perks or advantages. Example: "The position offered a competitive salary but was without benefits, which made it less appealing to many candidates."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Encyclopedias

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

50 human-written examples

The marketplace has provided choice without benefits.

The Economist

They work for minimum wage without benefits.

The New York Times

This model is not without benefits.

The Guardian

We were all healthy, so we could do without benefits.

The New Yorker

Andrew Nolin, 23, is another new employee without benefits.

The New York Times

The Pro Bowl can be a friendly without benefits.

The New York Times - Sports

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

7 human-written examples

The Basement provided the perfect trial for testing the friends-without-benefits relationship Amber and I had forged.

Vice

Yet its remoteness is not without benefit.

The New York Times

Significantly, Ms. McEneaney operates without benefit of one-point perspective.

The New York Times - Arts

I believe this without benefit of zapped fillings.

The New York Times

Not that feeling good about oneself is entirely without benefit.

The New York Times - Health

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When describing job offers or employment conditions, clearly specify what is included or excluded in the "benefits" package to avoid ambiguity.

Common error

Don't assume everyone understands what "benefits" include. Clearly state which benefits are missing (e.g. health insurance, paid time off) when using the phrase "without benefits" to provide clarity.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "without benefits" functions as a prepositional phrase, modifying a noun or verb to indicate the absence of additional advantages or provisions. As Ludwig AI indicates, it is a correct and usable phrase in written English.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

60%

Science

15%

Formal & Business

10%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

5%

Wiki

5%

Reference

5%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "without benefits" is a common and grammatically sound way to describe situations where additional perks or advantages are absent. As Ludwig AI confirms, it is correct and widely used. Predominantly found in News & Media, Science, and Formal & Business contexts, it clearly indicates a lack of supplementary provisions like health insurance or paid time off. While alternatives such as "lacking benefits" or "devoid of benefits" exist, "without benefits" remains the most frequently used. When writing, ensure you clarify exactly which benefits are absent to avoid ambiguity. Overall, it's a straightforward phrase with clear implications in various professional and general contexts.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

lacking benefits

Replaces "without" with "lacking", emphasizing the absence of benefits.

devoid of benefits

Uses "devoid" for a stronger emphasis on the absence of benefits.

absent of benefits

Uses "absent" to describe the lack of benefits.

excluding benefits

Focuses on the exclusion of benefits from a package or offer.

missing benefits

Highlights that benefits are not included or are missing.

not including benefits

States that benefits are not part of what is being offered or described.

without perks

Substitutes "benefits" with "perks", implying a lack of additional advantages.

excluding additional advantages

Replaces "benefits" with a more descriptive term, "additional advantages".

without supplementary provisions

Offers a more formal and detailed alternative to "without benefits".

lacking supplementary advantages

Combines "lacking" with a more detailed description of what's missing.

FAQs

How can I rephrase "without benefits" in a sentence?

You can use alternatives such as "lacking benefits", "devoid of benefits", or "excluding benefits" to convey a similar meaning.

What does it mean when a job is described as "without benefits"?

It typically means the position does not include standard employee benefits such as health insurance, paid time off, retirement contributions, or other similar perks.

Is it better to say "lacking benefits" or "without benefits"?

Both "lacking benefits" and "without benefits" are grammatically correct and can be used interchangeably, although "without benefits" is more commonly used.

What are the implications of working "without benefits"?

Working "without benefits" can mean higher out-of-pocket expenses for healthcare, less financial security for retirement, and fewer safety nets like paid sick leave.