For any imputation within the solution, player A always gets 1/4 and therefore cannot gain.
But the problem is inherent within the solution, in so much as you don't want to tell people what to do.
The imputations within the solution are viable because they are not dominated by any other imputations in the solution.
When A gets more than 1/4, players B and C share less than 3/4 and, therefore, can do better with an imputation within the solution.
Thus, even assuming the unlikely event that the long-term imbalance is resolved, how do we stay within the solution range?
It is stable because, for the members of the coalition, any imputation outside the solution is dominated by and is therefore less attractive than an imputation within the solution.
There is no self-domination within the solution, because if one imputation is substituted for another, one player gets more, one gets less, and one gets the same (for domination, each of the players forming a coalition must gain).
Suspended material within the solution was decanted and discarded.
To dominate the market, a player would need to decide where their niche lies within the solution matrix.
Within the solution set, a solution with the sub-lowest coefficient sensitivity (CS) is analytically obtained.
Numerical difficulties inherited from convection-dominated processes and high gradients near junctions typically results in oscillations within the solution.
