Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(5)
One swab was used per animal apart from in Collection K, where – at the owner's request – five animals from within the same enclosure were sampled with each swab.
For instance, if one stall has 5 animals in it, no horizontally or vertically adjacent stall within the same enclosure may contain exactly 4 or exactly 6 animals.
Two consecutive digits within the same enclosure are never horizontally or vertically adjacent to each other (but consecutive digits may be adjacent on opposite sides of an enclosure wall).
ANOVA analysis of variance These results are supported by mixed model analyses taking into account potential non-independence of males from cages grouped within the same enclosure.
We also conducted mixed model analyses to control for potential non-independence of subjects whose home cages were grouped within the same enclosure (i.e. with enclosure ID fitted as a random effect).
Similar(55)
The stillborn spirit ("I would have been Denis -- if she hadn't pushed her way into the world first") attempts somehow to account for simultaneous embodiments: "I had come back twice over in the same enclosure within space that is a planet".
Each experimental male was placed (within its home cage) inside a high-sided enclosure (each 1.25 m × 0.6 m × 0.8 m high) with either one (LSC treatment groups) or three (HSC treatment groups) other males present in the same enclosure (also within their home cages).
Two other birds from the same enclosure were then found to be missing.
Animals for which swabs were pooled always coinhabited the same enclosure.
"Some species of females can't even be kept in the same enclosure or else they will maul each other..
The female panda, Tian Tian, will then be put into the same enclosure as male panda Yang Guang.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com