Sentence examples for within the same collective from inspiring English sources

Interestingly, within the same collective of postoperative/posttraumatic patients, the prevalence of severe sepsis and septic shock was higher when the original 1992 ACCP/SCCM sepsis definitions were replaced by the revised 2003 SCCM/ESICM/ACCP/ATS/SIS sepsis definitions.

The present study was performed to compare the prevalence of different stages of sepsis and ICU mortality rates and find out the case mix within the same collective of postoperative/posttraumatic patients applying either the original 1992 ACCP/SCCM or the revised 2003 SCCM/ESICM/ACCP/ATS/SIS sepsis definitions.

Therefore, the present study was performed to find out the frequencies of diagnostic categories of sepsis (sepsis, severe sepsis, septic shock) and ICU mortality rates within the same collective of critically ill postoperative/posttraumatic patients applying the 2003 definitions with increasing cut-offs for the general and inflammatory variables.

You could see the same collective intelligence arise within the smart fridge.

Note that two different footprints (F^{(i)}) and (F^{(j)}) in a collective perspective can belong to the same collective group (L_{h}) and thus, they can be represented with the same collective footprint (C^{(h)}).

For 37% of the customers each individual footprint belongs to a different collective group, while for the rest the collective perspective changes the personal definition of their behavior putting two different individual footprint in the same collective group.

Frequencies of severe sepsis and septic shock were higher and mortality rates lower within the same patient collective, when the 2003 definitions (≥ 2/8 variables) instead of the 1992 definitions (≥ 2/4 variables) were applied in the same collective of postoperative/posttraumatic patients [ 8].

However, these factors can be neglected when longitudinally testing the same collective pre- and post-interventionally.

Within the same patient collective, applying the 2003 definitions instead of the 1992 definitions, prevalence of severe sepsis (61 vs. 56) and septic shock (205 vs. 162) was higher (p < 0.001).

Within the same patient collective, applying the 2003 definitions instead of the 1992 definitions, the prevalence of no SIRS (11 vs 110, respectively), no SIRS due to infection (sepsis) (0 vs 12), SIRS (129 vs 169) and sepsis (18 vs 52) decreased, and the prevalence of severe SIRS (169 vs 86), SIRS shock (121 vs 65) and septic shock (216 vs 168) increased.

Within the same surgical patient collective, applying the 2003 definitions instead of the 1992 definitions, prevalence of severe sepsis and septic shock was higher.