Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(2)
In this case, mean respiration rate for the entire excerpt would not be expected to be very different between the two different excerpt types, but changes in respiration within the excerpts would be expected to differ; this was indeed the case.
Since the results showed significant changes in psychophysiological responses within the excerpts, and these correlated with self-reported increases in pleasure, we can rule out the possibility that changes in psychophysiological responses were entirely due to familiarity rather than increases in pleasure.
Similar(58)
The numbers within parentheses after the excerpts represent the code numbers of the interviewees.
Google claims the excerpts fall within "fair use" statutes.
Once again, however, it is important to note the within-excerpt changes in physiology in response to the pleasurable pieces, which decrease the possibility that the effects were entirely due to recalling autobiographical events, since these would be relatively consistent throughout the piece.
However, as another way to deal with the issue we also took advantage of the within-excerpt design.
Following are the excerpts.
Both the excerpts are attached.
We'd print the excerpts.
The excerpts were sampled at 44.1 kHz.
Four other members then coded the excerpts.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com