Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(1)
Results based on 'R' value, and deviations in parity plot were falling within agreement level.
Similar(58)
We assessed within-group agreement by identifying questions that >50% of one response.
Orthopaedists (κ = 0.78) and CAPs (κ = 0.67) had substantial within-specialty agreement, while radiologists (κ = 0.53) had moderate agreement.
The within-subject agreement of pain report with known stimulus variation quantifies the criterion validity, or accuracy, of the measure.
The result remained significant, despite the decrease in the index of within-group agreement (MRPP; A = 0.069; p-value<0.001 p-value<0.001
The index of within-group agreement increased and the statistics remained marginally significant (MRPP; A = 0.010; p-value = 0.056).
Within-observer agreement was better than between-observer agreement.
We found very good within-observer agreement in a subsample.
16 18–21 23–27 There was a strong within-nurse agreement in our study.
These studies are done without analysis of the within-subject agreement.
This within-platform agreement rate is noteworthy compared to the ~40% cross-platform agreement rate previously reported [ 6, 9, 23].
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com