withheld from publication

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "withheld from publication" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when referring to information, data, or content that has been intentionally kept from being published or made public. Example: "The findings of the study were withheld from publication due to concerns about the methodology."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Encyclopedias

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

27 human-written examples

They did not request that the documents be withheld from publication.

Independent

What she did not expect was that the book would be withheld from publication.

The New York Times

The name of the employee who submitted the submission has been withheld from publication by the Senate committee.

The Guardian

The dust-up spilled into print only after two opinion pieces were withheld from publication in The Daily Princetonian.

The New York Times

A small amount of information has been withheld from publication because it might endanger local informants or give away genuine military secrets.

The Guardian

When huge financial gains hinge on showing success for a drug in a clinical trial, negative findings may be withheld from publication.

The New York Times

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

33 human-written examples

After the raid on Bethesda, the group stated on its website that it would withhold from publication the personal details of more than 200,000 gamers: "We actually like this company and would like for them to speed up the production of Skyrim, so we'll give them one less thing to worry about".

The Guardian - Tech

Determining whether statistical results were selectively withheld from the publication was problematic to establish; consequently, reporting bias was coded as 100%% unclear risk.

Current Psychiatry Reports

It was not withheld from the public.

The New York Times

Many argue that withholding it from publication merely generated additional mystique.

Independent

I know how difficult it can be to make decisions about the publication of relevant information - and sometimes, in a very few cases, to take the decision to withhold information from publication.

The Guardian

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Remember to be mindful of the context in which you use "withheld from publication"; ensure that your language maintains objectivity and avoids conveying unintended judgment or bias.

Common error

Avoid using "withheld from publication" loosely to imply censorship when the information was simply not deemed ready or relevant for public release. Censorship has strong negative connotations and is not interchangeable.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "withheld from publication" functions as a passive verb phrase, indicating that something (information, a document, etc.) has been prevented from being made public. This aligns with Ludwig AI confirming its correctness and usability.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

News & Media

50%

Science

24%

Encyclopedias

8%

Less common in

Wiki

4%

Opinion

4%

Health

4%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "withheld from publication" is a common and grammatically correct phrase used to indicate that information or content has been intentionally kept from being published or made publicly available. As Ludwig AI confirms, its usage is widespread across various domains, including news, science, and encyclopedias. The phrase carries a neutral to professional tone and is valuable for accurately describing situations where information control is exercised. Understanding its implications and potential ethical considerations is crucial for effective communication.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

suppressed from release

This phrase emphasizes the active prevention of the information's release, implying a deliberate act of suppression.

kept confidential

This phrase highlights the maintenance of secrecy and the intention to keep the information private.

not disclosed publicly

This phrase focuses on the lack of public dissemination, indicating that the information was not shared with the general public.

held back from distribution

This phrase suggests that the information was prevented from being circulated or spread among a wider audience.

not authorized for release

This phrase indicates that the information lacked the necessary approval or permission to be made public.

remained unpublished

This phrase simply states the fact that the information was never formally published or made available in print.

restricted from access

This phrase implies that access to the information was limited or denied to certain individuals or groups.

under embargo

This phrase indicates that the information was subject to a temporary restriction on its release, often until a specified date or time.

deemed unsuitable for release

This phrase suggests that the information was judged to be inappropriate or unfit for public dissemination.

withheld from the public eye

This phrase emphasizes the intention to keep the information hidden or concealed from general awareness.

FAQs

What does "withheld from publication" mean?

The phrase "withheld from publication" means that certain information or content has been deliberately kept from being published or made publicly available.

What are some alternatives to "withheld from publication"?

You can use alternatives like "kept confidential", "not disclosed publicly", or "remained unpublished" depending on the context.

When is it appropriate to use the phrase "withheld from publication"?

It's appropriate when referring to information or data that has been intentionally prevented from being released to the public or appearing in published form, often due to sensitivity, security concerns, or strategic reasons.

What are the ethical implications of information being "withheld from publication"?

The ethical implications depend on the context. While sometimes necessary for security or privacy, withholding information can also raise concerns about transparency, accountability, and potential suppression of important facts. Consider whether alternatives like "restricted from access" or "under embargo" are more appropriate.