withheld by

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "withheld by" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate that something has been kept back or not disclosed by a specific person or entity. Example: "The information was withheld by the organization due to privacy concerns."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Name withheld, by email If only it were so simple, Name Withheld, if only it were.

The Guardian - Lifestyle

No money is withheld by management".

Independent

Worker passports being withheld by owners/skippers.

The Guardian

(The last names of the contestants were withheld by the show).

The New York Times - Arts

Like good looks, it seems to them something given or withheld by nature.

The New Yorker

Her name is being withheld by The New York Times to protect her privacy.

The New York Times

The sender requested that his name be withheld and it was withheld by the Ethicist.

The New York Times

Canadian trusts are subject to a 15percenttaxax that is withheld by the broker.

The New York Times

Both boys' names were withheld by the police because of their ages.

The New York Times

Her name was withheld by the authorities because of her age.

The New York Times

How nice to live in the West, where such information is withheld by multinational corporations protecting the interests of stockholders!

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "withheld by", ensure that it's clear who or what is doing the withholding and what is being withheld. This clarity improves the sentence's precision.

Common error

Avoid using "withheld by" when a more direct verb like "concealed" or "suppressed" might be more appropriate. Consider the nuance you want to convey. Using "not disclosed by" is a good way to emphasize a more neutral tone.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "withheld by" functions as a prepositional phrase, typically used in a passive voice construction. It indicates the agent responsible for not disclosing or keeping something back, like information or an object. Ludwig confirms its common usage and grammatical correctness.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

67%

Science

18%

Formal & Business

5%

Less common in

Wiki

5%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "withheld by" is a grammatically correct and versatile phrase used to indicate that something has been kept back or not disclosed by a specific entity. Ludwig confirms its common usage across various contexts, particularly in news and media, and scientific publications. While it can be used in formal contexts, its register is generally neutral. When using "withheld by", clarity and precision are crucial. Consider using alternative phrases like "suppressed by" or "not disclosed by" depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

not disclosed by

Rephrases "withheld by" to explicitly state the lack of disclosure.

not revealed by

Replaces "withheld" with "not revealed", focusing on the absence of revelation.

suppressed by

Replaces "withheld" with "suppressed", emphasizing the act of preventing information from being known.

held back by

Uses "held back" instead of "withheld", conveying a similar meaning of retention.

unrevealed by

Similar to "not revealed", but slightly more formal in tone.

concealed by

Substitutes "withheld" with "concealed", suggesting a deliberate attempt to hide something.

unshared by

Replaces "withheld" with "unshared", emphasizing the lack of dissemination.

kept secret by

Replaces "withheld" with "kept secret", highlighting the maintenance of secrecy.

retained by

Substitutes "withheld" with "retained", emphasizing the act of keeping possession.

denied by

Substitutes "withheld" with "denied", which suggests information was requested but not given.

FAQs

What does "withheld by" mean?

"Withheld by" means that something has been deliberately kept back or not disclosed by a particular person or entity.

What can I say instead of "withheld by"?

You can use alternatives like "suppressed by", "concealed by", or "not disclosed by" depending on the specific context.

How is "withheld by" different from "rejected by"?

"Withheld by" implies something is kept back, while "rejected by" indicates something has been refused or not accepted. The phrases have distinct meanings and aren't interchangeable.

Is it grammatically correct to say "information was withheld by them"?

Yes, it is grammatically correct. "Information was withheld by them" is a passive construction indicating that they chose not to reveal the information.