withdrawn by

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "withdrawn by" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts where something has been retracted or taken back by a person or organization. Example: "The proposal was withdrawn by the committee after further consideration."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

Combat troops were withdrawn by July 2009.

The Guardian

Bextra was withdrawn by Pfizer in 2005.

The New York Times

A service that has been withdrawn by this sentencing.

The Guardian - Opinion

The inspection report was later withdrawn by Ofsted.

The Guardian

Those charges were withdrawn by a judge only last week.

The New York Times

The opinions were subsequently withdrawn by Justice officials.

The New York Times

It was withdrawn by the end of the year.

The Guardian

Aguero was withdrawn by Manuel Pellegrini after 66 minutes.

Independent

Credit is infused and withdrawn by central diktat.

The Economist

Heavy weapons are to be withdrawn by both sides.

Independent

Of that amount, $20,000 was successfully withdrawn by a person using a false identity.

The New York Times - Tech

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "withdrawn by" when you want to clearly indicate that an action, statement, or object has been formally or officially taken back or removed by a specific entity.

Common error

Ensure the subject that performed the withdrawal is clearly stated. Avoid sentences where it's unclear who or what caused the withdrawal, as this can lead to confusion.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "withdrawn by" functions as a passive construction indicating that an action has been performed on a subject by a specified agent. Ludwig examples show that it's used to describe the removal or retraction of something, such as troops, charges, or products.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

60%

Science

20%

Wiki

10%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

3%

Formal & Business

5%

Reference

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "withdrawn by" is a grammatically sound and frequently used passive construction. As confirmed by Ludwig AI, it is employed to indicate that something has been officially retracted or removed by a specific entity. Predominantly found in news and media, scientific publications, and wiki articles, its usage spans a range of formal to neutral contexts. When using this phrase, ensure clarity regarding the agent performing the withdrawal to avoid ambiguity. Consider related alternatives like "rescinded by" or "retracted by" for nuanced meanings.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

rescinded by

Emphasizes the formal cancellation or revocation of something such as a law or agreement.

retracted by

Highlights the act of taking back a statement or publication, often due to inaccuracy.

revoked by

Implies the official cancellation of a license, permit, or right.

repealed by

Specifically refers to the annulment of a law or statute.

cancelled by

Indicates the termination of an event, order, or agreement.

removed by

Focuses on the physical removal of something or someone from a place or position.

taken back by

A more informal way of saying something has been retracted or reclaimed.

recalled by

Suggests that something was brought back, often due to a defect or problem.

nullified by

Implies that something has been made void or ineffective.

abrogated by

Refers to the formal cancellation of a treaty or law.

FAQs

How is "withdrawn by" typically used in a sentence?

The phrase "withdrawn by" typically indicates that something has been taken back or removed by a specific entity. For example, "The offer was withdrawn by the company" indicates that the company retracted the offer.

What are some alternatives to "withdrawn by"?

Some alternatives include "rescinded by", "retracted by", or "revoked by", depending on the specific context.

Which is more appropriate: "withdrawn by" or "cancelled by"?

"Withdrawn by" is generally used when something is being taken back, while "cancelled by" is used when an event or agreement is terminated. The choice depends on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is there a difference between "withdrawn by" and "removed by"?

"Withdrawn by" usually implies a deliberate and formal act of taking something back, whereas "removed by" suggests a physical removal or displacement. The context will determine the appropriate phrase.