Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

with when compared

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "with when compared" is not correct in English and is awkwardly constructed.
It is not usable in written English due to its redundancy and lack of clarity. Example: "The results are impressive with when compared to last year's data."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

5 human-written examples

Recognizing that family caregivers provide the vast majority of all HPC care across geographies and settings in Canada [ 34], rural family caregivers often have comparatively fewer formal services to work with when compared to their urban counterparts.

It also offers a more manageable measure to start with when compared with complex carbon storage indicators.

Just as with EHR pushes in the U.S. and elsewhere, getting large-scale buy-in for this type of platform will be a challenge, but there are fewer privacy worries to contend with when compared to human medicine.

News & Media

TechCrunch

In this sense, older parents may feel that receiving emotional support is harder to deal with when compared to other types of support that do not require similar personal disclosures.

This appears easier and less distressing to cope with when compared to children with JDM who may need to inject themselves with doses of insulin two to three times daily as the case may be [ 29].

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

55 human-written examples

A cross-sectional study found a decreased frequency of circulating total CD27+ memory B cells in patients with RA treated with etanercept when compared with patients treated with methotrexate or when compared with healthy controls [ 6].

PD was more common and severe in patients with RA when compared with patients with OA [ 41].

Claims rose in line with inflation when compared with 2007.

News & Media

The Economist

England players have been psychologically less able to cope with this when compared with their German counterparts.

News & Media

The Guardian

Is it the fate of every generation of performer, however commanding, to seem touched with artifice when compared with what comes next?

News & Media

The New Yorker

Evaluation of locally recurrent tumour is better with MRI when compared with CT [4, 24, 27].

Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Avoid using the phrase "with when compared" in formal writing. Opt for simpler and more grammatically sound alternatives like "compared to" or "in comparison with".

Common error

The phrase "with when compared" contains unnecessary prepositions. Simplify your writing by using only "when compared" or "compared with" to avoid awkward phrasing.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

81%

Authority and reliability

2.8/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "with when compared" functions as a comparative conjunction, attempting to link two elements for the purpose of evaluation. However, it is considered grammatically incorrect due to its redundant structure. Ludwig AI highlights its awkward construction.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

Science

60%

News & Media

40%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Academia

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "with when compared" is generally considered grammatically incorrect and awkwardly constructed. Ludwig AI flags it as non-standard English. While it appears in some scientific and news contexts, it's best to opt for clearer and more concise alternatives like "compared to" or "in comparison with". The phrase's intended purpose is to draw comparisons, but its redundant structure undermines its effectiveness. Stick to established grammatical conventions for more precise and professional communication.

FAQs

Is "with when compared" grammatically correct?

No, the phrase "with when compared" is generally considered grammatically incorrect due to redundancy. It's better to use simpler alternatives like "compared to" or "in comparison with".

What's a better way to phrase "with when compared" in a sentence?

Instead of "with when compared", use phrases like "compared to", "in comparison with", or "when compared to" for clarity and grammatical correctness.

Which is correct, "with when compared" or "compared to"?

"Compared to" is the correct and preferred phrasing. "With when compared" is redundant and not considered standard English.

How can I avoid using "with when compared" in my writing?

Review your sentences and replace "with when compared" with more concise and grammatically sound options like "relative to" or simply "compared to". Always aim for clarity and precision in your writing.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

81%

Authority and reliability

2.8/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: