with war

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "with war" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts discussing topics related to conflict, military actions, or historical events involving war. Example: "The country has been struggling with war for decades, affecting its economy and social structure."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

With war".

The New Yorker

To charge with war crimes?

The New Yorker

W. associated his "freedom agenda" with war.

The New York Times

Compared with war, diplomacy is relatively cheap.

The Economist

But "peace" is inevitably intertwined with "war".

The New Yorker

The sea broils with war.

The Guardian - Arts

Corruption is commonly correlated with war.

The New York Times

But let's compare it with war.

The New Yorker

No fiction film dealt with war.

The Guardian - Film

It had nothing to do with war".

The New Yorker

"But people are fed up with war.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "with war", ensure the context clearly indicates whether you're referring to a current situation, a historical event, or a theoretical discussion. Clarity is key to avoid ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid assuming that everything happening concurrently is directly caused by "with war". Establish a clear cause-and-effect relationship rather than implying a connection based solely on timing.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "with war" primarily functions as a prepositional phrase, modifying verbs or nouns to indicate accompaniment, circumstance, or association. Ludwig's examples illustrate its use in various contexts, showing its adaptability in expressing connections to conflict.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

81%

Science

12%

Formal & Business

3%

Less common in

Wiki

2%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The prepositional phrase "with war" is a grammatically sound and frequently employed expression, predominantly used in News & Media, Science, and Formal & Business contexts. Ludwig confirms its adaptability in depicting various associations related to conflict. As evidenced by Ludwig, it serves to provide context, describe consequences, or highlight the impact of conflict, but it's crucial to establish clear causal links to avoid overgeneralizations. When using "with war", ensure clarity in its reference, whether current, historical, or theoretical, to prevent ambiguity. Semantically related phrases include "during wartime" and "amidst conflict". Understanding these nuances enhances precision in writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

in times of war

Highlights the temporal aspect of conflict.

during wartime

Specifies a period directly related to war.

in a state of war

Highlights the formal declaration or existence of conflict.

amidst conflict

Emphasizes the environment or circumstances surrounding the war.

under conditions of war

Focuses on the specific circumstances caused by war.

in the context of war

Frames a topic within the broader circumstances of war.

concerning warfare

Refers to war and its various aspects.

regarding armed conflict

Emphasizes the armed nature of the war.

in connection with war

Similar to 'in relation to war', but slightly more direct.

in relation to war

Connects a topic to the subject of war.

FAQs

How can I use "with war" in a sentence?

You can use "with war" to describe situations, emotions, or consequences directly linked to conflict. For instance, "Aleppo's inhabitants have got used to living with war", or "History tells us that with war comes rape".

What are some alternatives to "with war"?

Depending on the context, you could use phrases like "during wartime", "in times of war", or "amidst conflict".

Is it grammatically correct to start a sentence with "with war"?

While grammatically correct, starting a sentence directly with "with war" can sometimes sound awkward. It's often better to rephrase to provide more context or use a different structure to enhance readability. For example, instead of saying "With war, everything changes", you might say "Everything changes with war".

What's the difference between "with war" and "in war"?

"With war" generally describes something that accompanies or is associated with a state of conflict. "In war" typically indicates location or participation within a conflict. For example, "dealing with war crimes" vs. "fighting in war".