Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

with the sound of

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

'with the sound of' is a grammatically correct and commonly used phrase in written English.
It can be used to describe the source or origin of a sound, or the way something sounds. Examples: 1. The room was filled with the sound of children playing and laughing. 2. The movie began with the sound of crashing waves and seagulls in the background. 3. She woke up to the sound of birds chirping outside her window. 4. The old radio emitted a crackling sound with the volume turned up. 5. With the sound of thunder approaching, they quickly took shelter under the trees.

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Sunday began with the sound of rockets.

News & Media

The New York Times

Start with the sound of the waves.

My biggest problem is with the sound of the drill.

The camp is abuzz with the sound of WestConnex work.

News & Media

The Guardian

The call ended with the sound of a crash.

News & Media

The New York Times

The air judders with the sound of the electric sander.

News & Media

The Guardian

In love with the sound of my voice.

The hills are alive with the sound of girl talk.

News & Media

The New Yorker

The air was loud with the sound of ravens.

The hills are alive with the sound of minds exploding?

News & Media

Independent

"Go!" The room erupted with the sound of women talking.

News & Media

The New Yorker
Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "with the sound of" to vividly describe a scene or environment by focusing on its auditory elements. It's particularly effective in creative writing to evoke atmosphere.

Common error

While grammatically correct, excessively using "with the sound of" in formal or technical writing can make your prose sound less concise. Opt for stronger verbs or more direct descriptions of the sound when appropriate.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

87%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "with the sound of" functions primarily as a prepositional phrase modifying a noun or clause. It adds descriptive detail by specifying the auditory environment or accompaniment to a particular subject or action. As confirmed by Ludwig, it is a common and grammatically correct construction.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

60%

Academia

20%

Wiki

10%

Less common in

Formal & Business

3%

Science

4%

Reference

3%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "with the sound of" is a grammatically sound and frequently used prepositional phrase employed to enrich descriptions through auditory details. Ludwig confirms its correctness and common usage across varied contexts. Predominantly found in News & Media and academic sources, its purpose is to evoke sensory imagery and set a scene, although overuse in formal writing should be avoided. Alternatives such as "accompanied by the noise of" or "to the accompaniment of" offer nuanced options for expressing similar ideas. By understanding its function and communicative purpose, writers can effectively use "with the sound of" to engage their audience.

FAQs

How can I use "with the sound of" in a sentence?

You can use "with the sound of" to describe an environment, an event, or a memory by focusing on the auditory sensations associated with it. For example, "The beach was alive with the sound of crashing waves".

What are some alternatives to "with the sound of"?

Some alternatives include "accompanied by the noise of", "to the accompaniment of", or "punctuated by the sound of", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it ever incorrect to use "with the sound of"?

While grammatically correct, using "with the sound of" too frequently or in contexts where a more direct description would be more effective can make your writing seem less precise. Consider if a stronger verb or a more concise phrase would be a better choice.

What's the difference between "with the sound of" and "accompanied by the sound of"?

"With the sound of" generally describes something that exists simultaneously with a sound. "Accompanied by the sound of" "accompanied by the sound of", however, suggests that the sound is an addition or a secondary element to the primary subject.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

87%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: