"with the same reasoning" is a correct and usable phrase in written English.
It can be used to indicate that the same logical thought process or justification is being applied to a new situation or concept. Example: "The jury found the defendant not guilty of murder, and with the same reasoning, they also acquitted him on the charge of burglary."
With the same reasoning you would ban the use of cars if it saved a single life claimed in road accidents.
The expediting act, thus, enables the government to circumvent an appeals court that has already handed a significant defeat to the government by overturning a Microsoft decision by Judge Jackson and, with the same reasoning, could do it again.
The labeling of fans as blue-collar also lies with the same reasoning that allows most Americans to identify as middle class (or at least lower-middle class or upper-middle class).
The sentencing procedure in use in Kansas these days is a reaction to a 2001 decision by its Supreme Court, which struck down the state's sentencing law with the same reasoning later used by the United States Supreme Court.
With the same reasoning, we have extracted criteria from the permission list for class Actions.
With the same reasoning, we did not differentiate between agonistic and antagonistic activities, since binding to the receptor is a prerequisite for both activities.
If they persist in it, even after repeated attempts to persuade them otherwise, why should not their desire to die command as much respect as that of someone with terminal cancer?Extending the same reasoning to everyone, healthy or ill, would recreate in contemporary society an approach to suicide reminiscent of the Roman stoics, the Japanese samurai or the French Montagnards.
Since | exp ( λ x / μ 0 ) | < 1 for all λ with Re λ > 0, the same reasoning as in (I) and (II) applies and the right side of Eq. (30) is smaller than its left side.
If it was necessary to get a foreign leader to help us with a war, could we, by the same reasoning, kill someone who was merely a political threat — or a political figure who, say, by rallying domestic opposition to drone strikes in a foreign country, we'd decided was helping Al Qaeda.
One would not generally question a patient with delusions about the voluntariness of their beliefs, and we suggest that the same reasoning should apply to patients with FMSS.
The same reasoning applies to those with pathological fractures, for instance due to malignancy.
