with the cost

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "with the cost" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing expenses or financial implications associated with a particular action or decision. Example: "We need to consider the benefits of the project along with the cost involved in its implementation."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

After that, it will increase with the cost of inflation.

The Guardian - Business

However, every country is struggling with the cost.

The Guardian

Start with the cost of the scheme itself.

The Guardian - Business

The measure would also help states with the cost.

The New York Times

Wages are out of kilter with the cost of living.

The Guardian - Opinion

With the cost of medicines, it was just awful".

The New York Times

It has nothing to do with the cost".

The New York Times

The seller took issue with the cost of repairs.

The New York Times

The first has to do with the cost of labour.

The Economist

But there are also several perks, beginning with the cost.

The New York Times - Tech

Support for such legislation has increased along with the cost of prescription drugs.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "with the cost", ensure the context clearly identifies what the cost is associated with. Being specific enhances clarity and avoids ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid focusing solely on the initial price. Consider long-term maintenance, operational expenses, and potential unexpected fees that contribute to the overall "with the cost".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "with the cost" functions primarily as a prepositional phrase. It modifies a verb or noun, indicating consideration of expenses or financial implications. As noted by Ludwig, it's a correct and widely applicable expression. This function is evident in examples like "help with the cost" or "inconsistent with the cost."

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

67%

Science

15%

Formal & Business

7%

Less common in

Academia

3%

Encyclopedias

1%

Wiki

1%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "with the cost" is a grammatically sound and frequently used prepositional phrase that introduces or emphasizes the financial implications of a situation. As affirmed by Ludwig, its broad applicability spans various registers, including news, science, and business. While seemingly straightforward, overlooking hidden or long-term costs when using this phrase can be a common pitfall. To enhance clarity, it's best practice to explicitly identify what the cost relates to. By understanding its function, purpose, and potential misinterpretations, writers can effectively employ "with the cost" to ensure well-rounded and financially informed discussions.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

taking the expenses into account

This phrase highlights the act of including expenses in an overall evaluation.

considering the financial implications

This alternative focuses on the financial consequences that need to be taken into account.

accounting for the outlay

This alternative focuses on the amount of money that is spent or invested.

factoring in the monetary value

This suggests a more formal and precise evaluation of the cost.

regarding the monetary commitment

This phrase highlights the financial obligation or pledge involved.

in light of the expenditure

This implies making a decision or assessment given the amount of money spent.

assessing the affordability

This emphasizes whether something is within one's financial means.

considering the price tag

This is a more informal way to refer to the cost, often used when discussing consumer goods or services.

given the economic impact

This suggests considering the broader financial effects or consequences.

bearing the financial burden

This emphasizes the negative aspect of cost, framing it as a weight or obligation.

FAQs

How can I rephrase "with the cost" to sound more formal?

For a more formal tone, consider using phrases like "taking the expenses into account", "factoring in the monetary value", or "regarding the monetary commitment".

What is the difference between "with the cost" and "at the expense of"?

"With the cost" typically refers to the financial implications of something, while "at the expense of" implies a sacrifice or negative consequence to achieve something else. They aren't interchangeable in most contexts.

In what situations is it best to use the phrase "with the cost"?

Use "with the cost" when discussing budgets, financial planning, investments, or any situation where the monetary implications are a primary consideration. It is effective in both formal and informal contexts.

Are there any common misinterpretations associated with the phrase "with the cost"?

A common misinterpretation is focusing solely on the initial price and neglecting associated expenses like maintenance, operation, or potential risks. Always consider the comprehensive financial impact.