According to standpoint theorists, people with standpoint are politically aware and politically engaged people outside the mainstream.
Because people with standpoint have different experiences and access to different domains of expertise than most members of a culture, they can draw on rich conceptual resources for creative thinking.
In contrast, commentators with other standpoints frequently glorify them, endowing them with transformative capacities and programmes that they do not always possess.
He claimed that: "If I have frequently had occasion to deal with the standpoints of Buddhism, and particularly Zen Buddhism, the fundamental reason is that [the original form of reality and the original countenance of human being] seem to me to appear there most plainly and unmistakably" (NKC X, 288; Nishitani 1982, 261).
Finally, analysis by insider or outsider researchers, that is, researchers with different standpoints, such as clinical or user researchers can also affect the interpretation of the interview's content and the presentation of results [ 14].
However, results provided in this study, agree with the standpoint suggested by Brooke [ 50], arguing that kdr may act with certain co-factors that are thus far unidentified.
The standard conception is compatible, furthermore, with dual standpoint theories.
Consistent with this standpoint, Rostami et al. (2012) found a negative association between student burnout and interest.
A natural way to interpret this point of view is to contrast it with the standpoint of theoretical reason.
Given a certain Strawsonian orientation, the proper strategy is to begin with the standpoint of the members of the moral community holding an agent responsible.
