Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
The phrase "with scientific rigor" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the thoroughness and precision of scientific methods or research. Example: "The study was conducted with scientific rigor, ensuring that all variables were controlled and results were accurately measured."
Exact(18)
The "Foucauldian" left, he writes in "Achieving Our Country," "represents an unfortunate regression to the Marxist obsession with scientific rigor".
But exactly how these processes occur, and how they relate, remains to be shown with scientific rigor.
At the time, he was convinced that a life in psychology would allow him to ask the big questions about the mind and answer them with scientific rigor.
The origin of life on Earth remains a mystery, but the question can still be approached with scientific rigor.
Given the wide-reaching implications of quality metrics, it is essential that they be developed and implemented with scientific rigor.
Homeopathy exhibits two basic problems: Its fundamental principle has no scientific basis; and even more persuasive, controlled, randomized studies performed with scientific rigor have shown that it's no better than placebo.
Similar(42)
Beckett handles the gruesome morgue chores with scrupulous scientific rigor, and his entomological knowledge of the feeding and breeding habits of maggots is awesome.
All novelists are scholars of human behavior, but Ian McEwan pursues the matter with more scientific rigor than the job strictly requires.
"All novelists are scholars of human behavior," but McEwan "pursues the matter with more scientific rigor than the job strictly requires".
When Baber is… The last "enemy combatant" being detained in America is incarcerated at the U.S. Naval Consolidated Brig in Charleston, South Carolina — a tan, low-slung building situated amid… All novelists are scholars of human behavior, but Ian McEwan pursues the matter with more scientific rigor than the job strictly requires.
Accordingly, from what has been said, we might have expected the existence of strong scientific evidence in favor of peer review, but surprisingly, there have not been many attempts to determine "with the scientific rigor they demand of their authors" [14] its effect through measurable variables, and little evidence supports its use [15], [16].
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com