Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Exact(54)
Survival rates with revision for aseptic loosening as an end point were 100%.
Survivorship was 93.4% at 9 years with revision for any reason as the endpoint and 98.7% with aseptic loosening as the endpoint.
The survival analysis at 14 years was 97% with revision for any reason as the endpoint and the authors continue to utilize this implant system.
Of the components, 95.6% survived at 96 months with revision for aseptic loosening as the end point, with no significant difference between the 2 component designs.
Using the Kaplan-Meier survivorship analysis, with revision for any reason as an end point, survivorship was 94% at 12 years, 88% at 15 years, 74% at 18 years, and 61% at 23 years.
The small vertical spikes represent censored data Open image in new window Fig. 4 Cumulative survival of 50 prostheses with revision for any reason defined as failure event.
Similar(6)
They are stripped of their jackets and marked with revisions for some ultimate perfected edition.
It is true that soft tissue problems seldom exist in the revisions for dislocation, in contrast to the situation with revisions for ARMD.
We analyzed radiologically evident corrections, patient reported outcome and complications associated with revision TKA for flexion instability in a retrospective cohort of 37 patients with minimum one year follow up.
We also found that smoking status has a strong association with revision risk for TKA.
We hypothesized that early migration, as measured with RSA, is associated with late revision for aseptic loosening.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com