with repercussions

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "with repercussions" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate that an action or decision may lead to consequences or effects, often negative. Example: "The company decided to cut costs, but this decision came with repercussions that affected employee morale."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

"Players have to play with repercussions," he said.

The New York Times - Sports

It is widely considered a profound unifying experience, with repercussions beyond sports.

The New York Times - Sports

Because this is a vote with repercussions that will last forever.

The Guardian - Opinion

In the broader Islamic world, he has helped popularize an Islamic Reformation — with repercussions as sweeping as the Christian Reformation.

The New Yorker

After reading "Kindergarten 'Redshirting' Gets Tougher in N.Y.C., With Repercussions," a reader wrote to say she had the "opposite problem".

The New York Times

And yet this was a turning-point in Iranian history, with repercussions up to the present day.

The Guardian

In Paris, a leading Resistance figure is arrested by the Gestapo with repercussions for the organization throughout the country.

The New York Times

This is a significant finding with repercussions not just for the immediate family but also for the wider community.

The Guardian

But after bootleg copies appeared in Europe and lawyers threatened Mr. Towers with repercussions, the Ellington family decided to release it commercially.

The New York Times - Arts

The document was released with maximum discretion, yet it contains a big choice the government has made, with repercussions for parliament and the next election.

The Guardian - Opinion

City economists warned that a hit to trade and investment from Brexit would spark recession in the UK with repercussions for neighbouring economies.

The Guardian - Business

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "with repercussions", ensure the sentence clearly identifies the action or decision that leads to those repercussions. This provides context and makes the connection explicit.

Common error

While "with repercussions" is generally correct, avoid using it in very casual or informal contexts where simpler terms like "consequences" or "results" might be more appropriate.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "with repercussions" primarily functions as a prepositional phrase that modifies a verb, noun, or clause, indicating that an action or event will have consequences. Ludwig AI confirms its correct and usable status in English.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

61%

Science

27%

Formal & Business

3%

Less common in

Wiki

2%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "with repercussions" is a grammatically sound and frequently used prepositional phrase that indicates consequences following an action or event. Ludwig AI confirms its validity and broad applicability. While often implying negative outcomes, the phrase's impact can be neutral, though rarely positive. Its register suits neutral to professional contexts, particularly news, scientific, and formal business settings. Alternatives like ""with consequences"" or "with implications" can offer similar meanings with subtle variations. When using the phrase, clarity about the connection between the action and its repercussions is key. Overuse in very informal settings should be avoided.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

with consequences

This alternative is the closest in meaning, directly replacing "repercussions" with its synonym "consequences".

with implications

This alternative emphasizes the potential future effects and broader significance of an action.

entailing consequences

This phrase uses a more formal verb "entailing" to convey the idea of leading to or involving consequences.

bearing repercussions

This alternative uses the verb "bearing" to indicate that something carries or involves repercussions.

resulting in consequences

This phrase highlights the direct causal relationship between an action and its consequences.

with after-effects

This alternative focuses on the effects that occur after an event, emphasizing the temporal aspect of consequences.

with ramifications

This alternative suggests that the consequences are far-reaching and complex.

with fallout

This alternative uses a more informal term, "fallout", to refer to the negative consequences of an action.

with side effects

This alternative is often used in medical or technical contexts to describe unintended consequences.

with a domino effect

This alternative illustrates how one action triggers a chain reaction of consequences.

FAQs

What does "with repercussions" mean?

The phrase "with repercussions" means that an action, decision, or event has consequences, often negative, that extend beyond the immediate situation. It implies that there will be effects that are felt later on.

How can I use "with repercussions" in a sentence?

You can use "with repercussions" to describe the potential negative outcomes of a particular action. For instance, "The new policy was implemented quickly, with "with consequences" that are still being felt by employees."

What are some alternatives to "with repercussions"?

Alternatives to "with repercussions" include ""with consequences"", "with implications", "with ramifications", and "with after-effects". The best choice depends on the specific context.

Is it always negative when something is "with repercussions"?

While "repercussions" often implies negative consequences, it is not always exclusively negative. The nature of the repercussions can be neutral or, in rare cases, even positive, although the phrase is most commonly used to denote adverse effects.