Exact(1)
The Challenge Problems were computationally simple models that were intended as vehicles for the illustration and comparison of conceptual and numerical techniques for use in analyses that involve: (i) epistemic uncertainty, (ii) aggregation of multiple characterizations of epistemic uncertainty, (iii) combination of epistemic and aleatory uncertainty, and (iv) models with repeated parameters.
Similar(59)
The efficiency and robustness of this parameter estimation approach was tested with parameter sensitivity analysis as well as with repeated parameter estimation with various initial parameter estimates (initial guesses).
The efficiency and robustness of this parameter estimation approach was tested previously [1] in detailed with repeated parameter estimations with various initial parameter estimates (guesses) and with parameter sensitivity analysis.
Continuous, repeated parameters were tested with repeated measures ANOVA (repeated contrast) with time (baseline, one-year and three-year), and with interactions between time and psychotherapy.
The experiment was conducted in a completely randomized design with two breeds, two nutritional treatments and two pregnancy types, 10 repetitions for physiological parameters and six for blood parameters, with repeated measures over time.
We compared the parameters with repeated measures ANOVA test.
We hypothesized that change in the parameters measured would be observed with repeated anaesthesia.
The course of the CNV-parameters was examined with three-way ANOVAs with repeated measures.
With estimated parameters, our mathematical models did indeed show that elimination is possible with repeated treatments.
Dynamic exclusion was used with two repeat parameters: a 10 s repeat duration and a 60 s exclusion duration.
The parameter estimates of cohabiting and non-cohabiting parents of this free grouping model are presented in Tables 4 and 5. Subsequently, the free grouping model was repeated with parameter values that were fixed to be the same in the two groups (=no difference between cohabiting and non-cohabiting parents).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com