with permission

USAGE SUMMARY

"with permission" is correct and can be used in written English.
You can use it when you need someone else's permission to do something. For example, "With permission, I'd like to take a few days off work to attend a family reunion."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Reprinted with permission.

The New York Times

Reposted with permission.

The Guardian - Opinion

(His chart is republished below, with permission).

The Economist

(Used with permission of the publisher).

Encyclopedia Britannica

Reprinted with permission of M. Khodorkovsky.

The New York Times

(The excerpt is posted with permission).

The New York Times

With permission of the publisher, Liveright Publishing Corporation.

The New Yorker

It is reprinted with permission.

Forbes

From [2] with permission.

The Journal of Headache and Pain

Adapted with permission [73].

Nano Convergence

With permission of [110].

International Nano Letters

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Always credit the original source when using content "with permission". This upholds ethical standards and avoids potential copyright issues.

Common error

Failing to acknowledge the source after using content "with permission" can lead to accusations of plagiarism or copyright infringement. Always provide proper attribution.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "with permission" functions as a prepositional phrase, typically modifying a verb or noun. It indicates that an action is being performed or something is being used under the explicit consent or authorization of another party. Ludwig AI's analysis affirms its role in signaling authorized use.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

37%

News & Media

35%

Formal & Business

10%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

3%

Reference

0%

Social Media

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "with permission" is a prepositional phrase used to indicate that an action or use of content is authorized by another party. According to Ludwig AI, the phrase is grammatically correct and commonly used across various contexts, particularly in science, news, and formal business settings. When using this phrase, remember to properly cite the original source to avoid plagiarism. Related phrases include alternatives like "by consent" or "under license". Failing to seek authorization can lead to issues, making proper usage crucial.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

by consent

Emphasizes agreement or approval for an action or use.

having approval

Similar to 'with consent', but slightly more passive in its construction.

by authorization

Focuses on the act of authorizing something, rather than the permission itself.

authorized to

Highlights the state of being allowed or empowered to do something.

under license

Highlights the formal, legal aspect of permission, often involving a contract or agreement.

duly authorized

Adds a sense of formality and correctness to the permission granted.

as authorized by

Specifies the entity or authority that granted the permission.

subject to approval

Indicates that something is conditional and requires permission before it can proceed.

endorsed by

Implies a strong form of approval and support, often from a reputable source.

on condition of approval

Similar to 'subject to approval', emphasizing the conditional nature of the action.

FAQs

How do I properly cite something used "with permission"?

Always include a citation or credit line that clearly indicates the original source and that the material is being used "with permission". Follow specific citation guidelines (e.g. APA, MLA) appropriate for your context.

What's the difference between using content "with permission" and under fair use?

Using content "with permission" means you have explicit consent from the copyright holder. Fair use allows limited use of copyrighted material without permission for purposes like criticism, commentary, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, or research. The limits of fair use are often subjective.

What should I do if I can't obtain content usage "permission"?

If you can't get "consent", consider using alternative sources, paraphrasing extensively, or determining if your use falls under fair use guidelines. Seek legal advice if you're unsure.

Can I assume I have "permission" if the content is freely available online?

No, you should not assume you have "permission" simply because content is accessible online. Always check the copyright status and usage terms, and seek explicit "authorization" if needed.