Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigThe phrase "with past versus" is not correct and does not convey a clear meaning in written English.
It may be intended to compare past experiences or situations, but it lacks clarity and context. Example: "When analyzing the data, we need to consider the outcomes with past versus current trends."
Exact(1)
It deals with past versus the future.
Similar(57)
In his victory speech after the South Carolina primary, Obama framed his contest with Clinton as "the past versus the future".
It's about past versus future".
This election is about the past versus the future.
It's still fear versus hope, the past versus the future.
They saw the past versus the future.
The 2010 election comes down to the past versus the future.
Like the spiritual battle football fans face during the Super Bowl, the Grammys can become a metaphor you see the battles between your favorite artists as representing progress versus stagnancy, past versus future, good versus evil.
Repeating this analysis, with IDU re-classified, past and current IDU were associated with the outcome [respective AORs 1.67 (1.38–2.03) and 2.38 (1.78 3.9) versus never IDU]; the AOR for past versus current IDU was 0.70 (95% CI: 0.51, 0.97, P = 0.03).
Three comparisons were made: (1) ever versus never smoking; (2) current versus never smoking; and (3) past versus never smoking.
Specifically, medial meniscal extrusion occurred in 18% of obese participants (BMI = 30 kg/m; n = 61) versus 4% of nonobese participants (BMI < 30 kg/m; n = 233), and 13% of those with past knee injury (n = 60) versus 6% of those without past knee injury (n = 234).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com