Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(6)
The obese group was sub-divided into a hyperplastic (fat cell volume 659±420 pL; n = 6) and hypertrophic (fat cell volume 1077±570 pL; n = 6) group) with no between group difference in BMI.
The obese group in the gene expression study was sub-divided in two groups according to fat cell size; hyperplasia (fat cell volume of 641±450 pL; n = 7) and hypertrophia (cell volume of 1004±490 pL; n = 7) with no between group difference in BMI.
In the safety population, 83 patients (20.9%) underwent a THR between months 0 and 42, with no between group difference (table 6).
The study groups appear similar in overall demographic and clinical presentation with no between group differences in age, education, race, number of children, or rank.
They found similar levels of improvement in functional status (albeit with no between group analyses) amongst those who followed a walking program and those completing a progressive resistance training program.
Between baseline and follow up, the SF-36 domains role physical, energy/vitality, general health perception and the mental component summary score increased within the acupuncture group, with no between group differences (Table 4).
Similar(54)
All treatment conditions showed continued improvement by follow-up, with no between-group differences.
In MTT, cell numbers increased in all groups significantly (P = 0.000), with no between-group differences (P > 0.3).
Only 11 (16%) participants were opioid-free at the 1-month follow-up and 8 at the 6-month follow-up, with no between-group difference.
Finally, higher SOFA score (p = 0.04) but not lower SOFA score patients (p = 0.50) increased CD34+/CD133+/CD45−/VEGFR2 + EPCs number, with no between-group difference (p = 0.43).
The total score on the PHQ-15 from baseline to the end of treatment significantly decreased in the fluoxetine (− 10.7, p < 0.0001) and sertraline (− 10.3, p < 0.0001) treatment groups, with no between-group difference (F = 0.0701, p = 0.7924).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com