with need

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase 'with need' is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to describe having a requirement or necessity for something. For example, "My job requires me to have good problem-solving skills, so I need to learn new techniques and develop my skills further with need."

✓ Grammatically correct

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

59 human-written examples

with 30,000 people and with 15 bureaus.

The New Yorker

Apocalypse Now, with 561.

Independent

I won with 12".

Independent

Viktor Yushchenko with 5.45%.

Encyclopedia Britannica

with 6 passengers.

The New Yorker

He finished with 27.

The New York Times - Sports

with 19 points.

The New York Times

With 3-D printing.

The New York Times

(With 40 total).

The New York Times

With R3hab and Quintino.

The New York Times - Arts

Lundqvist finished with 45.

The New York Times - Sports

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Consider using more common alternatives like "in need of" or "requiring" for clarity and wider acceptance.

Common error

Avoid using "with need" in overly formal or academic writing; it can sound awkward. Opt for stronger, more direct phrasing such as "requiring" or "necessitating".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "with need" functions primarily as a prepositional phrase, modifying a verb or noun to indicate a state of requiring something. Though grammatically sound, Ludwig suggests its usage is not as frequent as other alternatives.

Expression frequency: Missing

Frequent in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, while grammatically correct, the phrase "with need" is rarely used in contemporary English. Ludwig highlights that it functions as a prepositional phrase to express a requirement or necessity, but its uncommon usage makes it less effective than alternatives such as "in need of" or "requiring". Consider opting for these more common and direct phrases for improved clarity and acceptance in both formal and informal contexts. Furthermore, Ludwig's AI suggest that the phrase is correct, but the absence of examples clearly demonstrates its rarity.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

needing

Direct gerund form emphasizing the state of requiring something.

requiring

Similar to needing, but often implies a more formal or official requirement.

in need of

Emphasizes the state of lacking something essential, focusing on deficiency.

wanting

Indicates a desire or wish for something, which may not be strictly essential.

lacking

Highlights the absence of something, creating a sense of deficiency or incompleteness.

in want of

A more formal and somewhat archaic way to express lacking something.

necessitating

Focuses on the act of making something necessary or required.

dependent on

Highlights reliance on something else to meet a requirement.

calling for

Suggests a demand or requirement for something, often in a more forceful way.

obliged to

Implies a sense of duty or obligation to have something or do something.

FAQs

How can I use "with need" in a sentence?

While grammatically correct, "with need" isn't very common. You might say, "The project must be completed with need for precision" but it's often better to use a more common alternative.

What can I say instead of "with need"?

You can use alternatives like "in need of", "requiring", or "necessitating" depending on the context.

Is it better to say "with need for" or "in need of"?

"In need of" is generally preferred and more common in standard English. "With need for" is less frequently used.

What is the difference between "with need" and "requiring"?

"Requiring" is a more direct and active way to express necessity. "With need" is less common and can sound somewhat passive or indirect.