with multiple parties

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "with multiple parties" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when referring to situations, agreements, or discussions that involve more than one group or individual. Example: "The negotiation process was complex, as it required collaboration with multiple parties to reach a consensus."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

32 human-written examples

"Negotiations for our optical-fiber business continue with multiple parties," the spokeswoman said.

The New York Times

Finally, calling a meeting with multiple parties from across the organization also requires tremendous facilitation skill.

Harvard Business Review

The system has grown beyond simple "I'll take yours, if you take mine," with multiple parties sometimes involved.

The New York Times

And before filling the December calendar with multiple parties, cookie baking and shopping, try to be realistic about what's doable.

The Washington Post

Since we were trading concurrently with multiple parties, we leveraged the same data points into multiple new sightings and confirmations.

MIT Technology Review

Or, no long having to constantly check you are working on the correct version of a document when working with multiple parties.

Stanford University

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

28 human-written examples

Both him and McCurley said that they haven't had an overdose at Double Double Land, but that they have had issues with people who got too fucked-up and even had issues with multiple party-goers getting roofied at one point.

Vice

When the America Invents Act was being debated in Congress, experts warned that the new joinder rules would lead to less efficient and more expensive patent litigation by preventing the efficiencies (and cost-sharing arrangements) that come with having multiple parties in one suit.

Forbes

Historically, organizations have rarely trusted one company to become a central data repository, "either because of the proprietary value of their data or due to a lack of trust in others". With blockchains, multiple parties maintain a replica of recorded transactions that can't be changed.

Forbes

The students are tasked with working out whether to seek a mutually agreed accord among multiple parties with competing agendas, interests, and values.

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Mr. Cuomo has proposed ending the requirement that candidates wishing to run on the ballot line of parties in which they are not registered members receive the authorization of party leaders; his proposal would change, but not eliminate, New York's unusual fusion voting system, under which candidates may run for office with the support of multiple parties.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "with multiple parties", ensure the context clearly defines who these parties are and their roles. This avoids ambiguity and enhances clarity.

Common error

Avoid using "with multiple parties" without specifying the nature of the parties involved. Generic usage can leave the reader wondering about the relationships and responsibilities within the context.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "with multiple parties" functions as a prepositional phrase modifying a noun or verb. It indicates the involvement or association of several distinct entities in an action, agreement, or situation. Ludwig AI confirms its correct usage.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

News & Media

58%

Academia

23%

Science

19%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Social Media

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "with multiple parties" is a common and grammatically correct prepositional phrase used to indicate the involvement of several entities in a given situation. As per Ludwig AI, it is suitable for use across various contexts, including news, academic writing, and general communication. The phrase's function is to clarify the scope of participation, and it maintains a neutral register. To ensure clarity, it's advisable to specify the nature and roles of the parties involved. Consider alternatives like "involving several entities" or "among various participants" for nuanced expression.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

involving several entities

Replaces "parties" with "entities" and uses "involving" to emphasize the inclusion of different bodies.

among various participants

Substitutes "parties" with "participants" and uses "among" to suggest a collective context.

with numerous stakeholders

Replaces "parties" with "stakeholders" to highlight those with a vested interest.

in conjunction with several groups

Uses "in conjunction with" to indicate collaboration and replaces "parties" with "groups".

alongside diverse actors

Emphasizes the variety of participants by using "diverse actors".

with a multitude of actors

Replaces "multiple" with "multitude", suggesting a large number of involved parties.

including many organizations

Specifically refers to "organizations" instead of a general "parties".

entailing various interests

Shifts focus to the interests involved rather than the entities themselves.

incorporating different factions

Uses "factions" to denote potentially conflicting groups.

with diverse participants involved

This is a more verbose version, rephrasing the sentence to focus on participation and diversity

FAQs

How can I use "with multiple parties" in a sentence?

You can use "with multiple parties" to indicate that several groups or individuals are involved in a situation, agreement, or discussion. For example, "The contract negotiation involved discussions with multiple parties to ensure all interests were addressed."

What can I say instead of "with multiple parties"?

You can use alternatives like "involving several entities", "among various participants", or "with numerous stakeholders" depending on the context.

Is it better to use "with multiple parties" or "involving multiple parties"?

Both "with multiple parties" and "involving multiple parties" are grammatically correct and can be used interchangeably. The choice depends on the specific emphasis you want to convey. "With" emphasizes the presence or association, while "involving" highlights the active participation.

What is the difference between "with multiple parties" and "with multiple stakeholders"?

"With multiple parties" is a general term referring to any groups or individuals involved. "With multiple stakeholders" specifically refers to those who have a vested interest or are affected by the outcome. Using "stakeholders" implies a more significant or direct impact on those involved.