with means

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "with means" is correct and can be used in written English.
It is used to mean "by means of" or "by way of." For example, "He earned enough money with means of his job to buy a new car."

✓ Grammatically correct

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

59 human-written examples

with 30,000 people and with 15 bureaus.

The New Yorker

Apocalypse Now, with 561.

Independent

I won with 12".

Independent

Viktor Yushchenko with 5.45%.

Encyclopedia Britannica

with 6 passengers.

The New Yorker

He finished with 27.

The New York Times - Sports

with 19 points.

The New York Times

With 3-D printing.

The New York Times

(With 40 total).

The New York Times

With R3hab and Quintino.

The New York Times - Arts

Lundqvist finished with 45.

The New York Times - Sports

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When writing formally, consider using more common and readily understood alternatives like "by means of" or "through the use of" instead of "with means" for clarity.

Common error

Avoid substituting "with means" when a clearer prepositional phrase such as "by means of" or "using" would be more appropriate, enhancing readability and avoiding ambiguity.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "with means" functions as a prepositional phrase, indicating the method or instrument used to achieve something. Ludwig's AI confirms its correctness but suggests that it is less common than alternatives.

Expression frequency: Missing

Frequent in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, while the phrase "with means" is grammatically correct, according to Ludwig, it is a less common and somewhat formal way to indicate the method or resource used to achieve something. More direct and widely accepted alternatives like "by means of", "using", or "through the use of" are generally preferred in both formal and informal contexts. Due to its rarity, "with means" might sound slightly unusual to contemporary readers. Therefore, consider using it judiciously and opt for alternatives to enhance clarity and readability. Since no specific authoritative sources are frequently employing the phrase, choosing more conventional options is advisable.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

by means of

Focuses on the method or instrument used to achieve something.

through the use of

Highlights the tool or resource employed to accomplish a task.

via

A concise way to indicate the intermediary or channel.

using

Emphasizes the application or utilization of a particular resource.

by utilizing

Similar to using, but with a more formal tone and emphasis on effectiveness.

by virtue of

Indicates that something is achieved because of a particular quality or power.

by the agency of

Highlights the entity or force that brings about a result.

through the medium of

Implies a conduit or channel through which something is conveyed or achieved.

by way of

Signifies a method or manner in which something is done.

with the help of

Suggests assistance or support in achieving a goal.

FAQs

How can I use "with means" in a sentence?

The phrase "with means" indicates the method or resource used to achieve something. However, alternatives like "by means of" or "through the use of" are generally preferred for clarity.

What can I say instead of "with means"?

You can use alternatives such as "by means of", "using", or "through the use of" depending on the context.

Which is correct, "with means" or "by means of"?

Both phrases are grammatically correct, but "by means of" is more commonly used and widely accepted in formal writing.

What's the difference between "with means" and "using"?

"With means" and "using" can often be interchanged, but "using" is a more direct and frequently used alternative. "With means" might sound slightly more formal but less common.