with lower spending

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "with lower spending" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing financial matters, budgets, or cost-saving measures. Example: "The company was able to increase its profits with lower spending on marketing."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

6 human-written examples

Last year he proposed to cure half of California's budget deficit with higher taxes and half with lower spending.

The Economist

While the president's aides said it was important to engage the public on taxes, others say he has not prepared the country for the sacrifice that would come with lower spending.

The New York Times

In a change of tack from saying in 2010 that he was imposing cuts out of necessity, rather than from "some ideological zeal", the prime minister told the Lord Mayor's banquet that the government has shown in the last three years that better services can be delivered with lower spending.

The Guardian

By contrast, the HIE showed reduced primary care was associated with lower spending on hospitalization [4].

Health Economics Review

When I asked whether he might follow the rental model that Rentomojo offers to appeal to young workers with lower spending power, Murty explained that he believes demand is higher for permanent ownership of furnishings in the longer term.

TechCrunch

There is now also substantial evidence that good adherence may be associated with lower spending, likely due to improvements in the health status of adherent patients.

Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

51 human-written examples

But they are expected to start with far lower spending assumptions than the administration and far bigger surplus estimates, allowing more room for tax cuts.

The New York Times

He asserts that he can cut taxes without net loss of revenue by closing unspecified loopholes; he asserts that he can cut discretionary spending to levels not seen since Calvin Coolidge, without saying how; he asserts that he can convert Medicare to a voucher system, with much lower spending than now projected, without even a hint of how this is supposed to work.

The New York Times

A rise in cash spending is linked with lower total spending, as consumers become stingier with their health budgets.More important to America's overall health spending, however, is the effect of insurance coverage.

The Economist

We find consistent evidence that more persistent use of older oral antidiabetes drugs, ACE inhibitors, ARBs, and statins is associated with reduced hospitalization and lower spending for traditional Medicare services by beneficiaries with diabetes.

Diabetes Care

​Wet Seal Inc became the fourth US apparel retailer to file for bankruptcy in two months as the sector struggles with growing competition and lower spending by teen shoppers.

The Guardian - Business

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When aiming for clarity in financial reports or business communications, pair "with lower spending" with specific metrics. For example, "achieved higher profits with lower spending on marketing" enhances understanding.

Common error

Avoid assuming that "with lower spending" automatically leads to positive outcomes. Reduced spending must be strategically aligned with goals. For example, implementing "with lower spending" without assessing the impact on quality or productivity can be a critical mistake.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "with lower spending" typically functions as an adverbial modifier, indicating the circumstances or conditions under which an action is performed or a state exists. Ludwig AI confirms this phrase is usable in written English, often in financial or budgetary contexts.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

News & Media

44%

Science

33%

Formal & Business

11%

Less common in

Academia

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "with lower spending" functions as an adverbial modifier that indicates reduced expenditure as a condition or method. Ludwig AI indicates that it is a correct and usable phrase suitable for various contexts, especially those involving finance and economics. While often associated with positive outcomes, it's important to avoid assuming causation and to consider the broader impact of cost reductions. Related phrases include "with reduced expenditure" and "with decreased costs". The phrase appears most frequently in news and scientific contexts.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

with reduced expenditure

Focuses on the act of spending less, emphasizing the reduction in total expenses.

with decreased costs

Highlights the reduction in the amount of money required, specifically referring to costs.

with more economical spending

Emphasizes efficiency and careful management in how money is used.

with decreased financial outlay

Focuses on the decrease in the amount of money spent or invested.

with leaner budgets

Implies a more efficient and economical allocation of resources, specifically referring to budgets.

with curtailed expenses

Emphasizes the action of limiting or restraining expenses, suggesting careful control.

with minimized outlays

Focuses on reducing the amount of money spent, particularly on specific projects or activities.

with thriftier allocations

Highlights the wise and economical use of resources, specifically referring to allocations.

with conservative fiscal management

Highlights a cautious and restrained approach to financial matters, implying reduced spending.

with restrained financial resources

Implies limiting financial resources to keep the level of spending low.

FAQs

How can I rephrase "with lower spending" in a business context?

In a business context, you can use alternatives such as "with reduced expenditure", "with decreased costs", or "with leaner budgets" to convey a similar meaning.

What is the difference between "with lower spending" and "cost-effective"?

"With lower spending" refers to the act of spending less money, while "cost-effective" describes something that provides good value for the money spent. Something can be cost-effective without necessarily involving lower spending overall.

Is it always beneficial to operate "with lower spending"?

While lower spending can improve profitability and efficiency, it is not always beneficial. Cutting costs without considering the impact on quality, innovation, or customer satisfaction can lead to negative consequences.

Which prepositions can be used with "lower spending"?

The preposition "with" is commonly used, but you can also use "through" (e.g., "achieved efficiency through lower spending") or "by" (e.g., "improved profits by lower spending"), depending on the context.