with evidence of

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase 'with evidence of' is correct and usable in written English.
It is typically used to express a connection between something and evidence that has been found to support it. For example, "The researcher found a correlation between elevated cortisol levels and anxiety, with evidence of increased cortisol levels in anxious individuals."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Still, the March numbers were laced with evidence of growth.

The New York Times

The highways are crowded with evidence of new wealth.

The New York Times

De Hamel's urbane book is crowded with evidence of vandalism.

The Guardian - Books

The tachyarrhythmias were attenuated, with evidence of improved autonomic tone.

International Journal of Cardiology

Specimens with evidence of histologic chorioamnionitis were excluded.

American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

This was associated with evidence of a sympathetic response.

Neuroscience Letters

Why not with evidence of significant bacterial infection?

The New York Times

The trail was littered with evidence of human passage.

Encyclopedia Britannica

The United States has also presented Pakistan with evidence of proliferation, American officials say.

The New York Times

Then he confronts him with evidence of his crimes, as follows: " 'No,' he said.

The New York Times - Books

Even despite those efforts to hide the documents, they are littered with evidence of industry access".

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "with evidence of", ensure that the evidence is clearly stated or easily accessible to the reader. This strengthens your argument and enhances credibility.

Common error

Avoid using "with evidence of" when the evidence is weak or circumstantial. Overstating the strength of evidence can undermine your argument.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "with evidence of" functions as a prepositional phrase, often used to modify a verb or noun, indicating the presence of supporting information or proof for a particular claim or observation. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness and usability. Examples in Ludwig demonstrate its role in connecting a subject with verifiable support.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

54%

Science

37%

Academia

6%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

1%

Wiki

1%

Formal & Business

1%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "with evidence of" is a grammatically sound and versatile prepositional phrase employed to indicate the presence of support for a given statement. Ludwig AI affirms its correctness and widespread use across various contexts, notably in news, science, and academic writing. It serves to provide validation and enhance credibility by grounding assertions in verifiable facts. When using this phrase, it's important to ensure that the evidence is clear and relevant, avoiding overstatements or reliance on weak support. Related phrases such as "showing proof of" or "indicating the presence of" can be used as alternatives to add nuance to your writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

showing proof of

Emphasizes the act of providing verification or confirmation of something.

demonstrating signs of

Focuses on observable indicators or symptoms, implying a direct showing of something.

indicating the presence of

Highlights the suggestion or implication of something being present.

confirming reports of

Validates or verifies the accuracy of previously mentioned information or accounts.

substantiating claims of

Implies providing solid support to back up assertions or statements.

providing support for

Emphasizes the act of strengthening or reinforcing a particular idea or argument.

attesting to the existence of

Formally confirms or bears witness to the presence of something.

establishing facts about

Focuses on firmly setting or proving the truth regarding specific information.

corroborating details about

Adds supporting information to confirm or strengthen the existing details.

bearing witness to

Suggests personal observation and subsequent confirmation of an event or fact.

FAQs

How can I use "with evidence of" in a sentence?

You can use "with evidence of" to indicate that something is supported by proof or indications. For example, "The study found a correlation between exercise and improved mood, "demonstrating signs of" increased endorphin levels".

What are some alternatives to "with evidence of"?

Alternatives include "showing proof of", "indicating the presence of", or "confirming reports of depending" on the specific context.

Is it redundant to say "with clear evidence of"?

While not strictly redundant, "with clear evidence of" can sometimes be unnecessary. The phrase "with evidence of" already implies a certain level of support, so adding "clear" might be seen as emphasizing the obvious.

What's the difference between "with evidence of" and "with proof of"?

"With evidence of" is a broader term that can refer to any indication supporting a claim, while "with proof of" suggests more definitive and conclusive support. "Showing proof of" usually carries more weight than presenting evidence.