with equivalent breadth

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "with equivalent breadth" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing dimensions, comparisons, or characteristics that are similar in width or extent. Example: "The two pieces of fabric were cut with equivalent breadth to ensure a uniform appearance in the final product."

✓ Grammatically correct

Academia

Science

News & Media

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

60 human-written examples

Demosthenes was apt at combining abruptness with the extended period, brevity with breadth.

Wikipedia

The meeting impressed Amini with its breadth of representation.

The New Yorker

How could they compete with that breadth of expertise?

The Guardian

RQ rises with the breadth of a firm's activity.

Harvard Business Review

Distribution and major courses may overlap with the breadth requirements.

Cornell University

Perhaps only Walt Whitman — whom Mayakovsky passionately admired — wrote with similar breadth and exhilaration.

The New Yorker

Her beautiful port de bras fills her body with expansive breadth.

The New York Times - Arts

Mr. Bush stunned lawmakers in both parties with the breadth and boldness of his proposal.

The New York Times

"I fell in love with the breadth and depth of the program," Mr. Norton said.

The New York Times

Outside researchers are impressed with the breadth of the recommendations.

Science Magazine

And only paradigmatic and syntagmatic association showed significant correlations with vocabulary breadth (rs about.34-.60 .34-.60

Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "with equivalent breadth" when you want to emphasize that two or more items have a similar or identical width, scope or range. This phrase is suitable for technical, academic, or formal contexts where precision is important.

Common error

Don't use "with equivalent breadth" when you are referring to depth or height. "Breadth" specifically refers to width or scope, so using it in place of other dimensions will be incorrect.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "with equivalent breadth" functions as an adjective phrase modifying a noun, indicating that something possesses a width or scope that is equal to something else. It is used to specify a measurement or characteristic shared between two or more things, as Ludwig suggests.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

Science

30%

Academia

25%

News & Media

20%

Less common in

Formal & Business

15%

Encyclopedias

5%

Wiki

5%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "with equivalent breadth" is grammatically correct, as confirmed by Ludwig, and is used to describe entities having similar width or scope. Though not very common, its usage is consistent across formal and technical contexts, including academia and science. When writing, use this phrase when precision is needed and you want to highlight a shared dimension or extent. For more informal settings, simpler alternatives like "of equal width" or "with similar width" might be more appropriate.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

of equal width

Focuses specifically on the dimension of width, implying a precise match.

with similar width

Indicates a likeness in width but allows for minor variations.

having comparable scope

Emphasizes the extent or range, rather than physical width.

with matching extent

Highlights that the range or degree is the same.

of corresponding size

Indicates similarity in overall dimensions or magnitude.

with alike proportions

Stresses the balanced relationship of dimensions.

with uniform width

Implies consistency in width across an object or space.

with commensurate breadth

Uses a more formal term to suggest proportional correspondence in scope.

possessing equal extent

Emphasizes equality in terms of range or reach.

with parallel range

Highlights that the boundaries or limitations are similar.

FAQs

How can I use "with equivalent breadth" in a sentence?

You can use "with equivalent breadth" to describe objects or concepts that have similar width or scope. For example, "The two pieces of fabric were cut with equivalent breadth to ensure a uniform appearance".

What's a simpler way to say "with equivalent breadth"?

Alternatives include "of equal width" or "with similar width", which are more straightforward and easier to understand in general conversation.

Is "with equivalent breadth" appropriate for informal writing?

While grammatically correct, "with equivalent breadth" is more suited to formal or technical writing. In informal contexts, simpler phrases like "same width" or "similar size" might be better choices.

When should I use "with equivalent breadth" instead of "with equivalent depth"?

"With equivalent breadth" should be used when referring to the width or scope of something, whereas "with equivalent depth" should be used when referring to the depth or complexity. They are not interchangeable.