Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(9)
These relations are marked with double asterisk in Figure 10.
The differences between the sample marked with a single asterisk and each of those marked with double asterisk are statistically significant (p < 0.05).
For point (a), the last row of Table 2 (the one with double asterisk) reports the alignment performance for the additional dataset Carter.
Note the recurrence of BACH1, BACH2, AP1 and NF-E2 sites, marked with double asterisk, which bind to similar DNA sequences.
Distinguishing statements that are significant at p < 0.05 are highlighted with asterisk, and those at p < 0.01 are highlighted with double asterisk in the results section.
Comparisons resulting in P<0.05 considered statistically significant and identified with an asterisk, P<0.01 identified with double asterisk, and P<0.001 identified with triple asterisk.
Similar(51)
Means labeled with double asterisks are extremely significant different (P < 0.01).
c Those sequences with double asterisks were newly determined during this study.
Probability values <0.05 were considered statistically significant and are marked with a single asterisk, <0.01 with double asterisks and <0.001 with triple asterisks.
In the text and figures that follow, the residues located on designated subunit C are labeled with a double asterisk, those located on subunit B with a single asterisk, and those located on subunit A are not labeled with an asterisk.
Finally, it is not meaningful to apply the Gaussian SVM to the All NmaxCarriers fingerprint, due to Cover's theorem; this entry is indicated with a double asterisk.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com