with contributions from

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "with contributions from" is correct and usable in written English.
It is used to indicate that multiple people have contributed to a particular undertaking or action. For example, "This report was written with contributions from the entire team."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science & Research

News & Media

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

and P.D. with contributions from E.R.

Nature

With contributions from Elise Viebeck (@eliseviebeck).

The Washington Post

With contributions from UCB computer science faculty.

University of California, Berkeley

wrote the manuscript with contributions from all other authors.

Nature

L.D.W. wrote the manuscript with contributions from all authors.

Nature

T.B.A. led the writing with contributions from all authors.

Nature

A.S. wrote the paper with contributions from all authors.

Nature

S.H. wrote the manuscript with contributions from all co-authors.

Nature

With contributions from Envoy and Ann Saunderson, it's a belter.

The Guardian

wrote the manuscript with contributions from all co-authors.

Nature

Manuscript was written mainly by T.N. with contributions from N.U.

Nature

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When attributing contributions, be specific about the nature of each person's input to give proper credit and avoid ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid simply stating "with contributions from all authors" without detailing individual roles. This can dilute the impact of acknowledging specific expertise and efforts.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "with contributions from" serves as a prepositional phrase that functions to attribute input, assistance, or content creation to specific individuals or groups. It's used to acknowledge the involvement of others in a project, paper, or any collaborative work, as shown in the examples provided by Ludwig.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science & Research

50%

News & Media

25%

Academia

15%

Less common in

Formal & Business

5%

Wiki

3%

Reference

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "with contributions from" is a grammatically correct and widely used prepositional phrase for acknowledging input from various individuals or groups, as confirmed by Ludwig. It's most commonly found in scientific, academic, and journalistic contexts, serving to give credit and ensure transparency. While alternatives like "assisted by" or "in collaboration with" exist, the choice depends on the specific nuance you wish to convey. Remember to be specific about the nature of each contribution to avoid ambiguity and to provide proper credit. Ludwig’s AI analysis confirms that this phrase is a reliable and effective way to attribute input in a variety of writing contexts.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

assisted by

Emphasizes direct assistance in a task or project.

with the help of

Focuses on receiving aid or support from others.

in collaboration with

Highlights a cooperative effort among individuals or groups.

featuring input from

Indicates that the contributions are a prominent aspect of the work.

incorporating insights from

Stresses the integration of knowledge or perspectives.

acknowledged support from

Formally recognizes the assistance received.

drawing on the expertise of

Emphasizes reliance on the specialized skills of individuals.

thanks to the collaboration of

Expresses gratitude for collaborative efforts.

based on research by

Highlights the foundation of the work on existing research.

guided by the advice of

Indicates that decisions or actions were influenced by counsel.

FAQs

How can I use "with contributions from" in a sentence?

You can use "with contributions from" to credit individuals or groups who have provided assistance, insights, or content to a project, paper, or presentation. For example, "The report was written with contributions from various experts in the field."

What are some alternatives to "with contributions from"?

Alternatives include "assisted by", "in collaboration with", or "with the help of", depending on the specific context and nuance you wish to convey.

Is it correct to say "with contribution from" (singular)?

While "with contribution from" might be grammatically understandable, the standard and more widely accepted phrasing is "with contributions from" when acknowledging multiple sources of input. If only one person contributed, consider "with a contribution from".

How do I decide whether to use "with contributions from" versus another similar phrase?

Consider the nature of the input. If it was collaborative, "in collaboration with" might be more appropriate. If it was direct assistance, "assisted by" could work better. "With contributions from" is a general phrase suitable for various types of input.