with contributions by

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "with contributions by" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to acknowledge the individuals or entities that have contributed to a work, such as a book, article, or project. Example: "The research paper was published with contributions by several leading experts in the field."

✓ Grammatically correct

Academia

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

with contributions by Jürgen Matth* us.

The New York Times - Books

With contributions by Ph. C. Visser.

Nature

Jaroslav Pelikan; With contributions by Valerie R.

Yale University

Daniel Belasco; with contributions by Arnold M.

Yale University

Joshua Chuang; With contributions by Steven W.

Yale University

Dillian Gordon; With contributions by Caroline M.

Yale University

Richard M. Bissell, Jr.; With contributions by Jonathan E.

Yale University

Edited by Amy Eshoo; With contributions by Derrick R.

Yale University

Mason Klein; with contributions by George Baker, Merry L.

Yale University

Edited by Anita Chung; With contributions by Julia F.

Yale University

Edited by Sharon Lynn Kagan; With contributions by Peter R.

Yale University

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When listing multiple contributors, use the phrase "with contributions by" followed by a list of names. Ensure proper attribution to avoid plagiarism.

Common error

Avoid using "with contributions by" if the individuals listed were primary authors or held significantly more responsibility. In such cases, use phrases like "authored by" or "written by" to accurately reflect their role.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "with contributions by" functions as a prepositional phrase used to attribute credit to individuals or entities that have provided assistance or input to a specific work. Ludwig AI indicates that the phrase is grammatically correct and frequently used in various contexts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Academia

57%

News & Media

25%

Science

15%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

1%

Wiki

1%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "with contributions by" is a grammatically correct and widely used way to acknowledge individuals who have provided assistance or input to a work. Ludwig AI confirms its validity and common usage across diverse fields, particularly in academia, news media, and science. When using the phrase, ensure that the listed individuals indeed made contributions and were not primary authors, in which case a different phrasing would be more appropriate. Remember that depending on the context, other possibilities might be more accurate, like featuring input from or including assistance from.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

featuring input from

Focuses on the idea of incorporating feedback or ideas.

assisted by

Directly states the help received.

including assistance from

Emphasizes help provided, rather than intellectual contribution.

with the help of

Focuses on the support received, rather than the nature of the input.

collaborating with

Suggests a more active and equal partnership.

in collaboration with

Highlights the cooperative nature of the work.

acknowledging the work of

Formally recognizing someone's effort.

thanks to

Informal way of expressing gratitude for assistance.

developed in partnership with

Highlights a close working relationship during the project development.

courtesy of

Implies a gift or favor provided by the contributor.

FAQs

How to use "with contributions by" in a sentence?

Use "with contributions by" to acknowledge individuals or entities that have provided support, insights, or material to a project, publication, or event. For example: "The book was written by John Smith with contributions by Jane Doe and Peter Jones."

What can I say instead of "with contributions by"?

You can use alternatives like "featuring input from", "including assistance from", or "in collaboration with" depending on the context.

Is it correct to say "with contribution from"?

While "with contribution from" might be understood, the more common and grammatically standard phrase is "with contributions by". The plural form "contributions" acknowledges that individuals often provide multiple inputs or types of assistance.

What's the difference between "with contributions by" and "edited by"?

"With contributions by" indicates that individuals have provided supplementary material or insights to a primary author or editor. "Edited by", on the other hand, signifies that someone has taken primary responsibility for revising and preparing a work for publication.