with compared with

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "with compared with" is not correct in standard written English.
It is redundant and should be simplified to just "compared with" or "in comparison with." Example: "The results of the study were significant when compared with previous research."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

26 human-written examples

"I found him great to deal with, compared with these other Russian bureaucrats who all wanted to fleece you," says Graham Humes, an American who set up a charity in St . Petersburg

The New York Times - Magazine

Although he had a couple more inches of wheelbase to work with, compared with the Z3, he truncated the back end, so there is little visual balance for the long, voluptuous hood and nose.

The New York Times

Seven years after starting a business, says MEDEF, the average French entrepreneur employs only 7% more staff than he or she started with, compared with an extra 22% in Germany and 126% in America.Some efforts have been made to lighten the burden on employers to encourage them to hire.

The Economist

In the experiment, rigid cemented carbide balls were used to indent aluminium coated with, compared with PVD coatings, relatively thick (50 150 μm) foils.

Surface and Coatings Technology

For example, we saw the value that the applied UMs placed on recurrence relations, since it is usually what they work with, compared with the school emphasis on general formulas for a function.

International Journal of STEM Education

Crandall, who says he spent some time working with AT&T Research when it was talking to GM about some sort of joint venture, observes that "cars are enormously complex to deal with compared with what Apple is doing now.

Los Angeles Times

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

29 human-written examples

A Rotherham win is a top priced 4-1 with Bet365 compared with only 11-4 with Ladbrokes.

The Guardian - Sport

Also, suppression took longer among those with drug-resistant H.I.V. compared with those with nonresistant virus.

The New York Times

Chadwick adds: "Murder is easy compared with dealing with this.

The Guardian

Compared with universities with long traditions of wealth, N.Y.U.

The New Yorker

Fifty-two percent of the class of 2004 walked away with diplomas, compared with 59percentt citywide.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When making comparisons, use concise and grammatically correct phrases like "compared to" or "in comparison with". This ensures clarity and avoids redundancy.

Common error

Do not use the redundant phrase "with compared with". Simplify your sentence to use "compared with" or "in comparison with" for clearer and more effective writing.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "with compared with" functions incorrectly as a prepositional phrase attempting to introduce a comparison. However, it's grammatically flawed. Ludwig AI identifies the expression as redundant and suggests using just "compared with".

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

Science

52%

News & Media

44%

Formal & Business

4%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "with compared with" is flagged by Ludwig AI as grammatically incorrect due to its redundant nature. While it appears with common frequency across both scientific and news media sources, the intended purpose of drawing a comparison is better achieved by simply using "compared with" or other alternatives like "compared to", or "in comparison with". Therefore, it is recommended to avoid "with compared with" in formal writing to maintain clarity and grammatical correctness.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

compared to

Replaces "with compared with" with a more concise and grammatically correct prepositional phrase.

in comparison with

Provides a more formal alternative using "in comparison" instead of just "compared".

by comparison to

Offers a more emphatic way to introduce a comparison.

in contrast to

Highlights differences rather than similarities, offering a slightly different nuance.

as opposed to

Emphasizes a direct opposition or distinction between the items being compared.

as against

Primarily used in British English, it offers a direct comparison between two things.

versus

A shorter, more direct way to indicate a comparison, often used in titles or headings.

relative to

Focuses on the proportional relationship between the items being compared.

if we compare it with

This makes it clear that a direct comparison is being made.

when weighed against

Suggests a careful evaluation or consideration of the items being compared.

FAQs

How can I correct the phrase "with compared with" in a sentence?

The phrase "with compared with" is redundant. You should remove "with" and simply use "compared with".

What are some alternatives to "with compared with" for making comparisons?

Instead of "with compared with", you can use alternatives like "compared to", "in comparison with", or "as opposed to".

Is "with compared with" grammatically correct?

No, "with compared with" is not grammatically correct. It is considered redundant and should be avoided in formal writing. Ludwig AI confirms that it's incorrect.

When should I use "compared to" versus "compared with"?

"Compared to" and "compared with" are often used interchangeably, but "compared to" is generally preferred when emphasizing similarities, while "compared with" is used for examining differences.