Hence the eagerness of utilitarians and others with similar moral views to argue that no such conclusion follows from their way of understanding morality.
1793), an indictment for sending anonymous and threatening letters to a foreign minister with a view to extort money, Justice James Wilson argued that the circuit court could be given concurrent jurisdiction; Justice James Iredell argued that it could not; Judge Richard Peters, of the District of Pennsylvania, sided with Wilson, and the case continued.
"Quite clearly, these chaps have gone in there with a view to breaking this business up," he argued.
On Monday night, Clinton posted a message on Twitter that said, "If you won't say the KKK is deplorable, you have no business running the country" — a view that is hard to argue with.
The benefits of hosting the Games from a publicity and tourism point of view are hard to argue with.
Who could possibly argue with a view of life that combines a squeeze of determinism with a shake of liberty?
Biographer Arthur Hobson Quinn disagreed with this view, citing a fervent love letter to argue that Poe "loved his little cousin not only with the affection of a brother, but also with the passionate devotion of a lover and prospective husband".
Constituents with opposing views have every right to argue with me, and I have every right to argue passionately for my conservative values.
From a utilitarian point of view, this is hard to argue with, and during the 1970s a lot of people argued for it.
It's a point of view that's hard to argue with when the subject is hate crimes.
David Gergen, the former Republican adviser to Mr. Clinton and three other presidents, basically agreed with that view by arguing in his new book, "Eyewitness to Power: The Essence of Leadership: Nixon to Clinton," that the president would not challenge his wife once her health care plan was failing -- in part out of guilt.
