Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(60)
The "horse race" models were about 40 percent more accurate, with a standard error of 6.9 points and a simple average error of 5.6 points.
A model to predict MFA from USV measurements was created with a standard error of 1.84°.
The apparent Km for HQ was determined to be 2.2 μM with a standard error of.
num. of signatures received was β=−0.00839, with a standard error of 0.0024 and a p-value of 0.0046.
The area under the curve is 0.837 with a standard error of 0.67 and confidence interval of 0.705 to 0.968.
All data presented in this study were obtained from triplicate experiments with a standard error of ≤ ± 0.05.
The estimated 2015 U.S. soybean cultivated area based on the field sample was 341,000 km2 with a standard error of 23,000 km23,000
Conventional methods based on heat transfer theory can obtain the results with a standard error of 0.59, which is a relatively high value.
A cutting time prediction equation using the diffuse reflectance parameter, Tmax, predicted the cutting time with a standard error of 0.55 min.
The adjusted means for Log10Reduction (cfu/mL) were 3.003 (brush) and 3.302 (Pull Thru) with a standard error of difference of 0.154.
The model explained over 66% of the variance in the experimental data set based on 149 anaerobic digesters with a standard error of 0.12 L-CH4/LR-day.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com