with a heights of

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "with a heights of" is not correct in English.
It should be "with a height of" or "with heights of" depending on the context. You can use it when describing the measurement of something, typically in terms of vertical distance or elevation. Example: "The building was constructed with a height of 200 feet."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Wiki

News & Media

Encyclopedias

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

In track, he set USA Track & Field (USATF) and Amateur Athletic Union (AAU) national 15 16-year-old 15 16-year-old 15 16-year-old heights of 2.16 m and 7 feet, respectively, as a sophomore.

Wikipedia

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

58 human-written examples

But she won yesterday at an indoor meet in Birmingham, England, with a height of 15-2.

The New York Times - Sports

Tim Mack won the pole vault with a height of 19 feet 4 1/4 inches.

The New York Times - Sports

7) There are 283 Munros – mountains with a height of 3,000ft or more – in Scotland.

The Guardian - Money

With a height of 56 metres she is taller than Niagara falls and nearly three times the height of Centre Court.

The Guardian

The ship, with a height of 70m (210 feet), has been an imposing presence in Saint-Nazaire, visible from miles away.

The Guardian

With a height of 377 feet, or 115 meters, Vattenfall's turbines are visible from the coast in Kent.

The New York Times

And, with a height of only 56 inches, the Mini is a car that a lot of people can look down upon.

The New York Times - Travel

She heard of the ruling against them just before the high jump event at Zhukovsky, which she won with a height of 2m.

The Guardian - Sport

With a height of up to 9 metres (nearly 30 feet), mandacaru is a tall cactus and features succulent segmented stems that arise from a low woody base.

Encyclopedia Britannica

That honour now belongs to the Singapore Flyer; with a height of 165 metres, it outranks the London Eye by a full 30 metres.

The Guardian - Arts

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Always use the singular form "height" when referring to a single measurement or dimension. The correct phrase is "with a height of".

Common error

Avoid using the plural form "heights" when you intend to describe a single measurement. Using "with a heights of" is grammatically incorrect.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "with a heights of" is generally intended to function as a prepositional phrase modifying a noun, describing a particular dimension or attribute. However, due to its grammatical incorrectness, as noted by Ludwig, it fails to fulfill this function effectively. The correct phrase is "with a height of".

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

Science

35%

News & Media

25%

Wiki

15%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

10%

Formal & Business

10%

Reference

5%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "with a heights of" is grammatically incorrect. As Ludwig AI points out, the correct form is "with a height of". The intended use is to describe a vertical dimension, but the error undermines its effectiveness. While it may appear across various sources, including Science, News & Media, and Encyclopedias, its use is infrequent and should be avoided in formal writing. Remember to use the singular "height" to maintain grammatical accuracy.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

with a height of

Corrects the grammatical error by using the singular form 'height'.

having a height of

Rephrases the original to focus on the attribute of possessing a certain vertical measurement.

whose height is

Uses a possessive structure to describe an object's vertical dimension.

with heights reaching

Emphasizes the varying levels or extents attained in vertical measurement.

of a height of

Rearranges the original phrase while maintaining the core meaning.

reaching a height of

Highlights the attainment of a specific vertical dimension.

measured at a height of

Focuses on the process of determining the vertical dimension.

at an elevation of

Shifts the focus to altitude or vertical position above a reference point.

standing at a height of

Describes an object's state of existing with a certain vertical dimension.

with a vertical extent of

Emphasizes the measurement of the vertical dimension.

FAQs

What is the correct way to say "with a heights of"?

The correct way to phrase this is "with a height of". The word "heights" should be singular in this context, as it refers to a single measurement.

Can I use "with heights of"?

Yes, but the meaning would change. "With heights of" would be used to describe multiple different heights, not a single object with a specific height. For example, "The buildings had towers with heights of 100, 150, and 200 feet."

What can I say instead of "with a heights of"?

You can use the correct phrase "with a height of". Other alternatives include "having a height of" or "at a height of".

What's the difference between "with a height of" and "with heights of"?

"With a height of" refers to a single measurement, while "with heights of" refers to multiple measurements. The first is grammatically correct for describing one object's height, the second is grammatically correct when talking about multiple objects and their respective heights.