Sentence examples for with a cost effectiveness from inspiring English sources

Interventions yielding a DALY at a cost greater than three times GDP per capita (>$Int6000) are considered not cost effective, while those with a cost effectiveness ratio falling between $Int2000 and $Int6000 are considered cost effective.

As expected, amniocentesis based on advanced maternal age only is the least cost effective option, with a cost effectiveness ratio of $C74 037 per case of Down's syndrome.

Combined intervention is more costly but more effective than the alternative strategies with a cost effectiveness ratio of $851.6[95% CI: 849.82-853.55].

25 In line with guidance provided by the National Institute of Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) 26 we sought to identify the most cost effective intervention by comparing the incremental cost effectiveness ratio with a cost effectiveness threshold of £20 000-£30 000 per QALY.

Results were displayed with a cost effectiveness acceptability curve (CEAC) that shows the probability that the intervention is cost effective for different willingness-to-pay values for a life year saved.

To evaluate the (cost)effectiveness of the life review course 'Looking for Meaning', we carry out a pragmatic randomized controlled trial (RCT) with a cost effectiveness analysis (CEA).

Our analysis does suggest, however, that expanding supplemental health insurance for the elderly may be relatively cost-effective, with a cost-effectiveness ratio similar to that of younger cohorts [ 29].

For example, exenatide use in the U.K., relative to that of insulin glargine, was found to be dominated by insulin glargine in one study, whereas its use was found to be cost-effective (with a cost-effectiveness ratio of £22,420) in another.

All efficient screening programmes use strategies C or D (primary HPV screening with cytology triage), strategy E (primary HPV screening with a combination of cytology and HPV triage) or strategy I (primary cytology screening with HPV triage); however, strategy I was only cost-effective with a cost-effectiveness threshold below €7000 per QALY gained.

This suggests that the current screening program is cost-effective, with a cost-effectiveness ratio compared to no intervention of $35,000 per life year saved, but also that cost-effectiveness would be improved if the 3-yearly screening strategies were implemented.

3 5 Previous economic evaluations have found TKR to be highly cost-effective, with a cost-effectiveness ratio between €1276 and $18 300 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained for the average patient 6 10: well below the £20 000–£30 000/QALY range that the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence NICEE) considers cost-effective.