Your English writing platform
Free sign upSuggestions(1)
Exact(3)
The critical dimensions of the NW core-multishell heterostructure with a core radius of 100 nm for different lattice mismatch are shown in Fig. 7.
For example, for the GaAs/In0.2Ga0.8As/GaAs NW core-multishell QW heterostructure (1.5 % lattice mismatch) with a core radius of 100 nm and barrier thickness of 100 nm, the dislocation-free critical QW thickness is calculated to be 22 nm.
For a GaAs/In0.2Ga0.8As NW core-shell heterostructure with a core radius of 100 nm, the critical In0.2Ga0.8As shell thickness is determined to be 37 nm, which is much larger than that of In0.2Ga0.8As film grown on planar GaAs substrate (about 14 nm calculated by this model).
Similar(57)
Weber and her colleagues reported a core radius of 330 kilometers, which they also report online today in Science.
Combined SANS and SAXS analyses indicated that the micelle had a core radius of 18 nm and an overall radius of 36 nm, which were consistent with the transmission electron microscopy data.
Figure 2 shows the distribution of stress field over the cross section of three GaAs/In0.2Ga0.8As NW core-shell heterostructures with a core radius and shell thickness of 50, 20 nm (a, b), 100, 20 nm (c, d), and 50, 100 nm (e, f), respectively.
For NW core-shell heterostructure with a core radius larger than the critical core radius, there is a critical shell thickness, below which no dislocations will occur.
The magnetic field is extrapolated by a potential field towards the Martian surface with an outer core radius of r cmb=1680 km and a surface radius of r sur=3385 km.
To estimate the effective core radius of the structure with square shaped air-holes an approximation based on the air-filling fraction was used.
The radial and tangential components of velocity as well as the core radius of the tornado increase with increase in swirl ratio.
The core radii of simulated vortices with swirl ratios of 0.31 and 0.65 showed favorable agreement with visualized vortices by a laboratory tornado simulator.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.
Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com