Sentence examples for wild size from inspiring English sources

Because trophodynamics, based on the grazing and nutrient availability, are quite complex in the wild, size evolution might be important or even advantageous.

It may also be noted that limited data on early East Asian soybeans (Glycine max) and adzuki beans (Vigna angularis) indicate that as late as the third millennium BC they are still largely within the wild size range, with enlarged seed sizes from the later Bronze Age or Iron Age (Crawford and Lee, 2003; Crawford et al., 2005), periods in which ploughs were established.

Of note is that early West Africa populations, from the second and first millennia BC, have their averages firmly in the wild size range, although there are long tails of variation that extend into the larger size range (e.g. at Birimi).

A reference design was used in all hybridizations, composed of pooled total RNA from wild size-matched rainbow trout (n = 6).

Thus, long-leafed hybrid lineages rapidly evolved away from a wild-type size, whereas wild lineages evolved more slowly and did not evolve as extreme leaf lengths as the hybrid lineages.

As expected, barcodes that corresponded to strains of wild type size showed neither enrichment nor depletion.

In some cases, a prominent band larger than the expected wild type size was amplified by the F3-R1 primers from T Wis / T Wis embryo RNA.

The finless porpoise was listed as "vulnerable" on the IUCN "red list" database of the endangered species, and the Yangtze River population was even characterized as "endangered" due to its apparent decline in wild population size (Reeves et al. 2008).

It explains how one could theoretically turn the offspring of a wild, berry-size tomato into a plant bearing full-size tomatoes just by tinkering with one gene.

The rosette sizes of r1r2 35S:plantsT899A) plants had wild-type size as was observed for seedling roots.

In moving beyond the simple wild-domestic size dichotomy traditionally used when exploring the question of early animal domestication, this study has shown clear differences in the dental phenotype of wild, domestic, captive wild and hybrid Sus populations.