Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(59)
The wild population was clearly in decline.
In the wild, population densities are low.
Since they would do so because they convey a survival advantage, the wild population benefits.
Young birds would be reared until they fledge, whereupon they would rejoin the wild population.
Now suppose the worst happens: introduced genes spread in the wild population.
Their deaths set back efforts to recreate a self-sustaining wild population of the birds.
In fact the diminishing of a wild population is often the trigger that starts research on a new species' domestication.
Set conservative quota limits, limits everyone can agree on, that pose no risk to the wild population.
Hancocks said, "I don't think it is at all likely that any captive-giraffe population could replenish the wild population".
Esvelt plans to release enough genetically modified mice, tens of thousands of them, to overwhelm the wild population.
They don't breed, and no fish are added back to the wild population.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com