Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
Viswanathan et al. compared CT based and MRI based CTV and concluded that the width of CT based CTV was larger than that of MRI [ 23].
Similar(59)
Whereas diagnosing CA as a rule does not create difficulties, in case of diagnosing NOWCA it is necessary to find out whether the width of posterior nares in CT imaging is normal or diminished.
Comparisons on the accuracy of thoracic pedicle screws between the two classification methods showed that thoracic pedicle classification determined by the inner cortical width of the pedicle on CT images can help surgeons predict whether a screw could be accurately inserted into the thoracic pedicle which was of clinical significance.
Figure 2 shows a histogram of CT number with bin width of 10 by using 50-cm long core sample.
The classification is based on determining the cortical width of the inner pedicle on CT images: Type I includes thoracic pedicles that have no channel and an inner pedicle width of 0 1 mm.
Therefore, we propose the following thoracic pedicle classification based on the inner cortical width of the thoracic pedicle on CT scans: type I thoracic pedicle, which has no channel and an inner cortical width of 0 1 mm; type II thoracic pedicle, which has a channel.
Furthermore, it was not possible to perform subgroup analysis according to the number of CT detector rows and CT slice width due to incomplete reporting of included studies.
We have proposed criteria for establishing a thoracic pedicle classification based on the inner cortical width of thoracic pedicles as determined on CT scans, and believe these criteria can be of clinical significance.
Future advances of CT technology with improved spatial and temporal resolution and detector widths, as well as beam-hardening correction algorithms, will enhance the diagnostic accuracy of CTP.
The measurement of HU density was performed in a CT window set at a width of 700 and a length of 250.
Average sulci width of 3.4 mm has been suggested earlier based on the CT scans of 44 normal adults (Gyldensted and Kosteljanetz 1975).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com