Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
wich was
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
"which was" is a correct and usable part of a sentence in written English.
You can use it when referring to something that has already been mentioned or implied. For example, "I opened the door, which was a mistake."
News & Media
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
60 human-written examples
Which was…?
News & Media
Which was cheap.
News & Media
Which was pretty good.
News & Media
Which was your favorite?
News & Media
Which was enough.
News & Media
Which was refreshing.
News & Media
Which was a bother.
News & Media
"Which was fashion".
News & Media
Which was true enough.
News & Media
Which was utterly false.
News & Media
(Which was Bert, unpoetically).
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When proofreading, pay special attention to "which" and "witch" as they are common sources of spelling errors that can alter the meaning of your sentences.
Common error
Avoid confusing "which" (a relative pronoun) with "witch" (a sorceress). Double-check your spelling to ensure your meaning is clear and grammatically correct.
Source & Trust
89%
Authority and reliability
3.9/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
Which was" functions as a relative pronoun introducing a non-defining relative clause, adding extra information to a noun or noun phrase. Although Ludwig AI states that "wich was" is usable, it's important to note that it's a misspelling and should be avoided in formal writing.
Frequent in
News & Media
100%
Less common in
Science
0%
Formal & Business
0%
Academia
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
The phrase "wich was" is a misspelling of "which was", a common relative clause construction. While frequently found in various sources, as Ludwig AI indicates, its use is grammatically incorrect and should be avoided in formal writing. The correct spelling, "which was", introduces non-defining relative clauses, adding extra information. Remember to differentiate "which" from "witch" to maintain clarity. For formal communication, ensure accuracy and consider alternative phrasing where appropriate.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
which it was
Emphasis on 'it', indicating specific subject focus, while "wich was" is a general phrase.
that was
Replaces "which" with "that", simplifying the relative clause and providing less formal wording.
what it became
Focuses on the result or state achieved, differing from the original's general reference.
what that entailed
Highlights the consequences or implications, offering a causal aspect absent in the original.
what that meant
Emphasizes the significance or interpretation, providing a more explanatory tone compared to simple description.
and this involved
Connects a preceding statement with a consequence, focusing on the elements and aspects of the subject.
and this included
Specific inclusion of an element from the subject. It changes from general reference to particular inclusion.
as this constituted
Highlights that the subject is fundamental for the whole context. It changes the focus to a more important part.
the effect of this
Changes the subject, indicating an effect of something. It shifts from general description to specific consequences.
the result of this
Changes the subject, indicating a result of something. It shifts from general description to specific outcomes.
FAQs
How do I correct the spelling of "wich was"?
The correct spelling is "which was". "Which" is a relative pronoun used to introduce a relative clause, while "wich" is simply a misspelling.
When should I use "which was" in a sentence?
Use "which was" to add extra information to a noun or noun phrase. It introduces a non-defining relative clause, providing additional details that aren't essential to the sentence's core meaning.
What are some alternatives to "which was"?
Depending on the context, you can use alternatives like "that was", "it was", or rephrase the sentence to avoid the relative clause altogether. The best alternative depends on the specific meaning you want to convey.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
89%
Authority and reliability
3.9/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested