why not merge

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "why not merge" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when suggesting or proposing the idea of combining two or more entities, ideas, or groups for efficiency or collaboration. Example: "Given our overlapping goals, why not merge our efforts to achieve better results?"

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Wiki

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

10 human-written examples

So why not merge?

The New York Times

Why not merge the two in one grand goof?

The New York Times - Magazine

Also, if these functions merge, then someone might ask, as happened in Scotland, why not merge police forces?

The Guardian

Why not merge the cuisine of sunny Provence with the crowd-pleasing flavors of Tuscany, and serve it in a dining room ablaze with Van Gogh colors?

The New York Times - Food

And then one day we said, hey, why not merge the story about the Japanese kid with the one about the doctor?

The Guardian - Film

They approached Nilekani three years ago with an idea: Why not merge high-touch North American-style consulting with the processing power of thousands of Indian software engineers to build a new kind of consulting firm?

Forbes

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

50 human-written examples

COPE did not merge any reads, however.

Bioinformatics

In the end, I think there's a simple reason why these interfaces have not merged more rapidly: life-spans.

The Guardian - Tech

Unsurprisingly, some have asked why the two are not merged.

BBC

The smaller HDRA panel size explains why the GBS data were used as priority and why the two datasets were not merged.

Rice

Well, not merging per se.

TechCrunch

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "why not merge" when you want to suggest a combination of two or more entities, ideas, or processes to improve efficiency, create synergy, or achieve a common goal. This phrase is best used in contexts where collaboration is feasible and potentially beneficial.

Common error

Avoid using "why not merge" in highly formal or academic writing where a more nuanced and detailed proposal is expected. In such situations, opt for phrases that allow for a more elaborate justification and consideration of potential drawbacks. For example, use "it may be advantageous to consolidate" or "a merger could offer strategic benefits".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "why not merge" functions as an interrogative suggestion or proposal. It is used to introduce the idea of combining two or more entities or concepts, prompting consideration of the potential benefits of such a union. Ludwig examples showcase this function across various contexts.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

News & Media

60%

Wiki

20%

Science

20%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "why not merge" serves as a straightforward and grammatically correct way to suggest combining two or more entities for potential benefits. As validated by Ludwig, this phrase is generally neutral in tone and suitable for a range of contexts. While more common in News & Media, "why not merge" is also appropriate for Wiki entries, Science, and even casual discussions. Consider alternatives like "what about merging" or "why don't we combine" depending on the desired emphasis. Remember to avoid using "why not merge" in highly formal contexts that require a more detailed and nuanced proposal.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

why don't we combine

This alternative is a more direct suggestion for combining something.

what about merging

This alternative is a more exploratory suggestion.

how about a merger

This alternative focuses on the result of merging.

would it be beneficial to merge

This alternative explores the benefits of a merger.

is there a case for merging

This alternative questions for valid reasons to merge.

shall we consider merging

This alternative propose a formal discussion about merging.

why not unify

This alternative uses a slightly stronger verb implying a more complete union.

why not integrate

This alternative suggests a blending of elements while maintaining some distinctiveness.

let's amalgamate

This alternative is more formal and suggests a blending into a homogeneous mixture.

why not consolidate

This alternative implies streamlining and strengthening through combination.

FAQs

When is it appropriate to use "why not merge"?

The phrase "why not merge" is suitable when suggesting the combination of two or more entities for increased efficiency or benefit. It's best used in scenarios where collaboration is a viable option.

Are there any alternatives to "why not merge"?

Yes, alternatives include "what about merging", "why don't we combine", or "how about a merger". The best choice depends on the specific context and desired level of formality.

Is "why not merge" grammatically correct?

Yes, "why not merge" is grammatically sound. It's a common and accepted way to propose a combination or unification of two things.

What is the difference between "why not merge" and "why not unify"?

While both suggest combining elements, "why not merge" implies a blending that may retain some distinct characteristics, whereas "why not unify" implies a more complete and homogeneous integration.