Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(3)
moondoggy68 31 March 2014 2 07pm Why interview Greenpeace for an opinion?
Why "interview" a man who very likely himself cannot identify the line between click-bait punditry and madness?
Why interview a health care expert when one can shove a microphone in the face of a man whose skill set entails reading numbers aloud?
Similar(57)
(That's why interviews with artists have an irresistible appeal: they come off as the corollary to the art, or even as its raw material).
That's why interviews with directors, film of their appearances, their answers at Q. & A.s, are also, in effect, part of the oeuvre.
Then say why the interview was a good experience.
All this is to explain why my interview may not be as sharp as usual.
Arguments over when and why to interview fringe and extreme voices will continue.
And why not interview a few teachers, principals and thoughtful citizens?
Directors are an authority on the former, which is why an interview with a good director is almost always worthwhile.
Why not interview some of the critically acclaimed and commercially successful creators like Frank Miller, Neil Gaiman, Warren Ellis and Brian Michael Bendis?
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com