whose proficiency you

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "whose proficiency you" is not correct and usable in written English as it is incomplete and lacks context.
It could be used in a sentence where you are referring to someone’s skill level, but it needs additional information to be clear. Example: "I admire the teacher whose proficiency you mentioned in your report."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

60 human-written examples

We hated him all along" — and whose proficiency in this method probably explains why they are nine times happier than I am.

The New York Times

Rebecca was a sullen, stern woman whose proficiency in English had remained poor during her two and a half decades in the United States.

The New Yorker

But in Mr. Feldman's opinion, magic's true virtuoso was a largely forgotten Midwesterner whose act was routinely described as "the wonder show of the universe" and whose proficiency with cards was second to none.

The New York Times

Thanks for all your emails, and a final thought from Matthew Wassell whose proficiency at PGA Tour on the PC led him to this conclusion: "The mouse is the true test of golfing ability".

The Guardian - Sport

Eighty English-as-a foreign language learners, whose proficiency level ranged from beginner to intermediate, were randomly assigned into explicit-only feedback, implicit-only feedback, mixed feedback, reduced-explicit feedback and no-feedback control groups.

System

The data of students whose proficiency was above or below A2-B1 levels was not included in any analyses (n = 55), although they were free to continue with their classes and with the study.

Language Testing in Asia

Patient whose proficiency of the English language is not sufficient to carry out consent on scene.

BMJ Open

The proportion of individuals in London whose proficiency in reading and writing English is insufficient to answer a self-completion questionnaire may be higher than the proportion who are unable to understand and answer spoken questions in English.

BMC Medical Research Methodology

Once you've developed proficiency, you can use the guitar for freedom of expression.

WikiHow

Conspicuously absent was the nylon-string guitarist Toninho Horta, whose zephyrlike proficiency uplifts the album and might well have enlivened the set.

The New York Times - Arts

Eighty-three freshmen whose English proficiency was diagnosed as intermediate at a private university in central Taiwan participated in this study.

Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Ensure that when discussing proficiency, clearly specify the subject or person whose skill is being referenced. Avoid incomplete phrases that lack context.

Common error

Avoid using possessive pronouns without a clear noun or context. Instead of saying "whose proficiency you…", complete the phrase by specifying what or whom the proficiency belongs to, such as "the person whose proficiency you admire."

Linguistic Context

The phrase "whose proficiency you" is grammatically incomplete and requires additional context to function correctly. As Ludwig AI indicates, the phrase lacks clarity and needs completion to specify what or whom the proficiency belongs to.

Expression frequency: Missing

Frequent in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "whose proficiency you" is grammatically incorrect and requires completion to be meaningful. Ludwig AI confirms this assessment, highlighting the need for additional context to specify what or whom the proficiency relates to. Due to its incompleteness, the phrase has no established usage patterns and should be avoided in formal writing. Instead, consider using alternative phrases such as "the proficiency of whom you mentioned" or "the skills that you possess" to convey the intended meaning with clarity and grammatical correctness. To reiterate, ensure that when you intend to refer to a level of skill, clearly identify whose skill you are referring to.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

the proficiency of whom you mentioned

Replaces possessive "whose" with "of whom" to clarify possession and add context.

the skills that you possess

Focuses on the skills themselves rather than a possessive form.

the level of skill you have

Specifies "level of skill" for clarity.

your demonstrated abilities

Emphasizes demonstrated abilities, implying existing proof of skill.

the expertise you bring

Highlights expertise as a contribution.

the competence you display

Focuses on competence and its outward display.

the mastery you've achieved

Highlights mastery as a completed accomplishment.

the talent you exhibit

Emphasizes natural talent as a characteristic.

your degree of proficiency

Uses "degree of proficiency" to quantify skill.

the aptitude you show

Focuses on aptitude as potential skill.

FAQs

How can I correct the phrase "whose proficiency you"?

To correct the phrase, you need to complete it with a noun or a clause that provides context, such as "the candidate "whose proficiency you assessed"" or "the area "whose proficiency you are referring to"".

What are some alternatives to "whose proficiency you" that provide more clarity?

Alternatives include phrases like "the proficiency of whom "you mentioned"", "the skills that "you possess"", or "the level of skill "you have"", which are grammatically complete and provide better context.

Is "whose proficiency you" grammatically correct in English?

No, "whose proficiency you" is not grammatically correct as it stands. It's an incomplete phrase that needs additional context to be meaningful and grammatically sound. Without further information, it is unclear and considered incorrect.

What is the difference between "whose proficiency you" and "the proficiency of whom you"?

"Whose proficiency you" is an incomplete and ungrammatical phrase. "The proficiency of whom "you spoke of"" uses a more formal structure to refer to someone's skill, and it's grammatically correct, providing a clear reference point for the proficiency being discussed.