Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigThe phrase "whose material is" is correct and usable in written English
It can be used to refer to the ownership or origin of the material in question. Example: "The book, whose material is based on extensive research, provides valuable insights into the topic."
Exact(24)
Talk story about Tom Waits, 26-year-old performer and composer whose material is mostly blues.
Only official biographers, whose material is vetted by the palace, are allowed to see political material from the archive dating after 1918, she said.
Another scene that moves in unusual directions involves Nick Joe Dinicoll), a comedian whose material is so bad even his friends won't laugh at it.
The New Yorker, December 27 , 1976P. 16 Talk story about Tom Waits, 26-year-old performer and composer whose material is mostly blues.
By James Stevenson The New Yorker, December 27 , 1976P. 16 Talk story about Tom Waits, 26-year-old performer and composer whose material is mostly blues.
There is symbolic value to the idea that the first exhibition to open in the new millennium will be one whose material is completely invisible".
Similar(36)
In the 60's, there was Bill Cosby, whose material was familial and anecdotal.
Perhaps both Theia and Earth formed on opposite sides of the same accretion disk (whose material was spread evenly throughout).
Lorre was hesitant to say yes, but he pointed out the biggest danger for sitcom writers whose material was not vetted by an audience: "You never find out if you're wrong".
The concert, two-thirds of whose material was new to Ms. Cook's repertory, consisted of songs by Mr. Sondheim and his various collaborators, namely Leonard Bernstein, Jule Styne and Richard Rodgers, as well as their collaborators, including Oscar Hammerstein II, Jerome Kern, and Comden and Green.
The release charted well across the world, particularly with the single "Wasted Years", but notably included no writing credits from lead singer Bruce Dickinson, whose material was rejected by the rest of the band.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com